Nice work :)
Thanks for the sharing.
I think got to emphasize (to the Readers) that realisation is
more about discover the incorrect or wrong assumption AND not about
discovering a new information or fact.
For example, one cannot really say what is Non-duality. It is
not even 'no-subject-object' division . We can only point out what
existence has been assumed to be .. and thus break the assumption..
but we cannot define what it really is.
Knowldege like Non-duality, emptiness cannot be grasped at,
because they will immediately be defined (by the mind) and be
turned into another concept for grasping.
The tendency of the mind is to always find some reference point
and unconsciously define it. 'What is' simply cannot be defined,
but can only be known by 'what it is not.'
Nicely said... thanks. :) Ultimately there is no 'non-duality'
or 'emptiness'... non-duality and emptiness are merely pointers to
break the false assumptions we have about reality... but even 'non
duality', 'no self', 'emptiness' cannot be established. As they
said, even emptiness is empty!