can't remember any names sorry cos i just happened to read
some. i just mean the kinda 'God' that one reaches in
meditation? what's that kind of 'God' in that context?
Here's some quotations for you to ponder:
God
Thusness (2006, Is God A
Thing?):
This is an interesting topic and since it is allowed to discuss
more about God in a Buddhism forum, I would like to talk a little
more about the experience of 'AMness" in all things. 
Like a river flowing into the ocean, the self dissolves into
nothingness. When a practitioner becomes thoroughly clear about the
illusionary nature of the individuality, subject-object division
does not take place. A person experiencing AMness will find
AMness in everything. What is it like?
Being free individuality -- coming and going, life and death, all
phenomenon merely pop in and out from the background of the AMness.
The AMness is not experienced as an entity residing anywhere,
neither within nor without; rather it is experienced as the ground
reality for all phenomenon to take place. Even the moment of
subsiding (death), the yogi is thoroughly authenticated with that
reality; experiencing the Real as clear as it can be. We cannot
lose that AMness; rather all things can only dissolve and
re-emerges from it. The AMness has not moved, there is no coming
and going. This "AMness" is God. 
His Holiness The Dalai Lama:
A: I understand the Primordial Buddha, also
known as Buddha Samantabhadra, to be the ultimate reality, the
realm of the Dharmakaya-- the space of emptiness--where all
phenomena, pure and impure, are dissolved. This is the explanation
taught by the Sutras and Tantras. However, in the context of your
question, the tantric tradition is the only one which explains the
Dharmakaya in terms of Inherent clear light, the essential nature
of the mind; this would seem imply that all phenomena, samsara and
nirvana, arise from this clear and luminous source. Even the New
School of Translation came to the conclusion that the "state of
rest" of a practitioner of the Great Yoga--Great Yoga implies here
the state of the practitioner who has reached a stage in meditation
where the most subtle experience of clear light has been
realized--that for as long as the practitioner remains in this
ultimate sphere he or she remains totally free of any sort of veil
obscuring the mind, and is immersed in a state of great bliss.
We can say, therefore, that this ultimate source, clear light,
is close to the notion of a Creator, since all phenomena, whether
they belong to samsara or nirvana, originate therein. But we must
be careful in speaking of this source, we must not be led into
error. I do not mean chat there exists somewhere, there, a sort of
collective clear light, analogous to the non-Buddhist concept of
Brahma as a substratum. We must not be inclined to deify this
luminous space. We must understand that when we speak of ultimate
or inherent clear light, we are speaking on an individual
level.
Likewise, when we speak of karma as the cause of the universe we
eliminate the notion of a unique entity called karma existing
totally independently. Rather, collective karmic impressions,
accumulated individually, are at the origin of the creation of a
world. When, in the tantric context, we say that all worlds appear
out of clear light, we do not visualize this source as a unique
entity, but as the ultimate clear light of each being. We can also,
on the basis of its pure essence, understand this clear light to be
the Primordial Buddha. All the stages which make up the life of
each living being--death, the intermediate state, and
rebirth--represent nothing more than the various manifestations of
the potential of clear light. It is both the most subtle
consciousness and energy. The more clear light loses its subtlety,
the more your experiences take shape.
In this way, death and the intermediate state are moments where
the gross manifestations emanating from clear light are reabsorbed.
At death we return to that original source, and from there a
slightly more gross state emerges to form the intermediate state
preceding rebirth. At the stage of rebirth, clear light is apparent
in a physical incarnation. At death we return to this source. And
so on. The ability to recognize subtle clear light, also called the
Primordial Buddha, is equivalent to realizing nirvana, whereas
ignorance of the nature of clear light leaves us to wander in the
different realms of samsaric existence.
This is how I understand the concept of the Primordial Buddha.
It would be a grave error to conceive of it as an independent and
autonomous existence from beginningless time. If we had to accept
the idea of an independent creator, the explanations given in the
Pramanavartika, the "Compendium of Valid Knowledge"
written by Dharmakirti, and in the ninth chapter of the text by
Shantideva, which completely refutes the existence per se of all
phenomena, would be negated. This, in turn, would refute the notion
of the Primordial Buddha. The Buddhist point of view does not
accept the validity of affirmations which do not stand up to
logical examination. If a sutra describes the Primordial Buddha as
an autonomous entity, we must be able to interpret this assertion
without taking it literally. We call this type of sutra an
"interpretable" sutra.
Dzogchen text/tantra:
"I, the supreme source ["All-Creating King"], am the sole maker,
and no other agent exists in the world. The nature of phenomena is
created through me ... The very manifestation of existence itself
depends on me ... I am self-arising wisdom that has existed from
the beginning. I am the supreme source of everything, pure and
total consciousness ...'Consciousness' means that self-arising
wisdom, the true essence, dominates and clearly perceives all the
phenomena of the animate and inanimate universe. This self-arising
fundamental substance, not produced by causes and condition,
governs all things and gives life to all things ... As my nature is
unhindered and all-pervading, it is the celestial abode of wisdom
and luminous space: therein abides only self-arising wisdom. As I
am the substance whence everything arises, the five great elements,
the three worlds [i.e. the worlds of Desire, Form, and
Formlessness] and the six classes of beings [hell-denizens, ghosts,
animals, humans, Titans, and gods] are only my body, my voice, and
my mind: I myself create my own nature ... The root of all
phenomena is pure and total consciousness, the source. All that
appears is my nature. All that manifests is my magical display. All
sounds and words express only my meaning ...
"I am the core of all that exists. I am the seed of all that
exists. I am the foundation of all that exists. I am the root of
existence. I am 'the core', because I contain all phenomena. I am
'the seed', because I give birth to everything. I am 'the cause',
because all comes forth from me. I am 'the trunk', because the
ramificationsof every event sprout from me. I am 'the foundation',
because all abides in me. I am called 'the root', because I am
everything [emphasis added]"
(Translation of "The All-Creating King", published as The
Supreme Source, tr. by Adriano Clemente and Andrew Lukianowicz,
Snow Lion Publications, Ithaca, New York 1999, pp. 137-141,
157).
Love:
Scott Kiloby
Love is such a simple word, yet so misunderstood.
In my first book, “Love’s Quiet Revolution,” I used the word
love a lot as a pointer.
Through the years, I stopped using the word because people
seemed to misinterpret what was being said.
By love, I don’t mean one person loving another person, either
romantically or platonically. Certainly, that is a kind of
love that can arise.
But love, with regard to non-dual realization, is something
totally different.
Yes, this love is what is experienced when the sense of being a
separate person disappears.
But that is only a small part of it.
It’s not just the sense of a separate person that
disappears.
It’s the sense that nothing is separate.
No matter where you go, you cannot find something that feels
independent from what you are.
Nothing feels “out there,” estranged, or isolated.
Life is intimately present.
The sun feels just as inseparable as a bodily sensation.
Ask yourself, how far is the thought, “Sun,” from the warmth of
the sun? Both appear right here, in present awareness,
inseparably.
Love is the experience of all dualities collapsing. It is
the recognition that there is no thought that can capture the
freedom of life.
Opposites just don’t work anymore.
Words like time v. timelessness, form v. formlessness just don’t
convey solid information.
Dualities collapse, melting into one sweet essence.
Love is seeing two people arguing, knowing that there can be no
right without wrong, and so the two are inseparable even in the
heat of conflict.
The entire world feels intimate precisely because no separate
thing can arise without a thought arising. Things are really
thoughts. And thoughts appear intimately and inseparably
within the awareness, right here and now, that sees them.
Even the duality between awareness and thought disappears.
Love is not being able to find a thought that is actually
independent of awareness.
This nondual love cannot be comprehended. It is beyond the
mind. The most profound thought and the most absurd thought
are equally drenched in love. They are both love pretending
to be two different things.
The heart knows it unquestionably. But it is not the kind
of love we normally experience, thick with attachment to an
other.
In this love, there is no other. There is only love,
appearing in every form. And there is a knowing that there
aren’t really separate forms at all. Paradoxically, each form
is loved completely and totally in its own right.
This is a complete unknowing. But it is not simply the act
of throwing one's arms up in the air and saying, "I don't
know." That is just another label, a superficial
statement. This is a deep, deep unknowing that goes to the
very core of being. This unknowing removes every ounce of
what you take to be a separate self, leaving only love. This
is an unknowing that is not attached to the past and has no
expectations for future. Therefore, whatever arises is
perfect.
There is only love. So simple, so sweet. Nothing to
comprehend. Love just is. It is being whatever it is
being in this moment. Nothing is excluded.