no worries. there are many people who awake still dreaming.
read so many qyeries i get so feedup. years on in photography i
see people who still ask silly questions.
a guys using crop sensor asking is 18-50mm any better than a
24-70mm. wjhat i read sometimes i really cannot tahan want to reply
them kundu! they are the same just made for diffetn crop factor
bodies. off course you can still buy a 24-70 and use on a crop body
- just that it make no sense on the focal range only.
and there are people who wonders why the price of a 70-300mm
nikon VR is steeper than say a DX 55-300mm. this time you should
really look at the optics. the 70-300mm is ahrper than any of the
DX ramge of glasses man!
and people asking whynot buy the 18-200mm and be it. come one if
this lens can beat a two lens combination the other lens can close
shop no need sell already! superzooms suffers softness ay random
focal range and apertures, plus serious distortion at the wide end!
so you can forget about architural shoots not without any
distortion correction afterwards.
i read i really wonder if such forums really is helping people
improve knowledge on photography! then there are thos anal type who
like big holes, f2.8 f1.4 f1.0 but i see their photos they really
cannot handle the extreme shallow depth of field and their main
focal points (pottraits usually the face / eys) is off, focus else
where - even online posting cropped photos can see off already
imagine the priginal uncropped photos! then there are people who
get all piped up about people comparing cams with more focus points
and say a good cam no need many focal points lah. they should shoot
more.
