Herzong_Zwei wrote :
Not every effect will have a cause and not every cause will have
a effect.
Yes indeed. Buddha did say that certain events in nature do not
operate under the law of cause and effects. Phenomenon as a
fortuitous confluence of other events, causes and conditions also
do not come under this law.
There are also certain causes that are very weak and will not
have effects. For example you thought of killing someone, plotted
it in your mind and carry it out in your mind. The karmic seed,
karmic cause, planted is very weak and its effects is gone the
moment you hold within your mind loving thoughts.
Does this mean that dependent origination is not valid just
because you have a narrow view ?
Herzog_Zwei further wrote :
It is seen in everday life. When a person breathes, it causes a
disturbance in air pressure. Then if so, one's breathe can be the
cause of a Hurricane or a tornado but with so many people around in
this world, is there that many hurricane or tornado around the
world?
You are thinking of a linear relationship of cause and
effect. The butterfly flapping its wings in brazil and
causing a tornado in phillipines is a non-linear effect. It is like
commiting a small wrong and you thought that the karmic seed is
small or that your so-called good intention would help create good
karma. As the law of karma is non-linear the small wrong you have
committed may actually escalate into a major effect such as someone
losing his job, life or possession.
The notion of strange attractors - or law affinity - also come
into play.
Does your wrong observation of reality invalidate Buddha's
teachings ?
When we say that Buddha was wrong it could be our understanding
of Buddha's teaching was wrong.