ok, its not the same "you", but seriously i see that something
still got to be the same. that something which is the same which
gives rise to one continuum of different lives where the suffering
experienced is real. beyond that, i dont think i can understand
more, and i dont need to as i dont have the faculty.
as u might aware i'm pureland, to think that "I" want to be
"reborn" in the "pureland". to me, this "attachment" to form is
safe.
Everywhere, in all the realms of existence,
the noble disciple
sees only mental and corporeal
phenomena kept going through the
concatenation of causes and
effects. No producer of the
volitional act or kamma does he
see apart from the kamma, no
recipient of the kamma-result
apart from the result. And he is
well aware that wise men are using
merely conventional language,
when, with regard to a kammical
act, they speak of a doer, or
with regard to a kamma-result,
they speak of the recipient of the
result.
No doer of the deeds is
found,
No one who ever reaps their
fruits;
Empty phenomena roll
on:
This only is the correct
view.
And while the deeds and their
results
Roll on and on, conditioned
all,
There is no first beginning
found,
Just as it is with seed and tree.
...
No god, no Brahma, can be
called
The maker of this wheel of
life:
Empty phenomena roll
on,
Dependent on conditions
all.
Visuddhimagga XIX.
On Suffering:
"Mere suffering is, not any sufferer is found
The deeds exist, but no performer of the deeds:
Nibbana is, but not the man that enters it,
The path is, but no wanderer is to be seen."