Yes you can say mathematics only deal with conceptual analysis
and can never touch the nature of reality, i completely agree,
that's what i am talking about, those formulars in mathematics,i
got to remember it, there is no other way round, if you trying to
talking about direct awareness in mathematics, i tell you for most
of people doing mathematics there is no much direct awareness
around, but only pure formulars, calculation and calculation.
And i believe for alot of people who is in the industry, it's
very hard to avoid concept and habit, if you are a freelancer,
that may be another issue, for industry, they only concern about
the result, no matter how you think or behave, as long as you
handle the job well, it's fine.
Yes sometimes we discuss the 佛法, it's perfectly fine, but maybe
i have this habit thinking buddhism is not so flexible as taoism,
in taoism 无为无不为, it's pure middle way thinking, and very flexible,
but buddhism like many think, it's not so flexible, take an
example of avoiding habit and conceptualisation, you keep
emphasizing on.
i believe this habit and conceptualisation, is not all bad,
sometimes you have to wuwei wu buwei, so sometimes, if
habit and conceptualisation arise, you don't have to avoid it,
just let it be, adhere no interference principle, it's all
dependent on individual person, if you really want to
avoid habit, it's ok, it's your take, if your habit and
conceptuallisation continously arise, you also take it.People
is different ,but dharma is universally true, so i think the right
path of buddhism is the middle path, never go extreme, never
think like i have to avoid habit and conceptualisation,
it's all on yourself, if you want to avoid habit and
conceptualisation, fine, you have been advanced, if you don't
, also fine, buddhism never reject any
single person.
I do not think it is labelled as in flexible..as giving labels
to such it is already an attachment and differentiation...Buddhism
is a term when this group of people form the sangha, and registered
to be a religion. Buddha didnt meant to teach buddhism, neither he
meant to speak dharma...as for sentinent being like us, we need to
rely on it initially, but it is to build this foundation on
realisation on correcting views and understanding...
Dharma could not be spoken in the past, present nor future...it
is non flexi or flexi, it is how an individual realise the nature
of things, and having the right understanding, yet will not be
attach or continue to persist it.
There are also people who practise theravada, mahayana and
vrajyan, be it which path, it could not search through conceptual
nor wordly thesis, as one has to learn is to realise it...its like
a man on a raft to cross a river, you need the raft, but ulitmately
it is the man who manouer the raft to the right path...we rely on
the raft, but once we reach the shore, we discard the raft and we
contnue our destination...