yes, not "everything" .
Beliefs that are contrary to the
law of kamma
There are three philosophies which are considered by Buddhism to be
wrong view and which must be carefully distinguished from the
teaching of kamma:
1. Pubbekatahetuvada: The belief that all happiness and suffering
arise from previous kamma (Past-action determinism).
2. Issaranimmanahetuvada: The belief that all happiness and
suffering are caused by the directives of a Supreme Being (Theistic
determinism).
3. Ahetu-apaccayavada: The belief that all happiness and suffering
are random, having no cause (Indeterminism or Accidentalism).
The Buddha did not dismiss the importance of previous kamma,
because it does play a part in the cause and effect process, and
thus has an effect on the present in its capacity as one of the
conditioning factors. But it is simply one of those conditions, it
is not a supernatural force to be clung to or submitted to
passively. An understanding of the Principle of Dependent
Origination and the cause and effect process will clarify
this.
For example, if a man climbs to the third floor of a building, it
is undeniably true that his arriving is a result of past action --
namely, walking up the stairs. And having arrived there, it is
impossible for him to reach out and touch the ground with his hand,
or to drive a car around. Obviously, this is because he has gone up
to the third floor. Or, having arrived at the third floor, whether
he is too exhausted to continue is also related to having walked up
the stairs. His arrival there, the things he is able to do there
and the situations he is likely to encounter, are all certainly
related to the "old kamma" of having walked up the stairs. But
exactly which actions he will perform, his reactions to the
situations which he meets there, whether he will take a rest, walk
on, or walk back down the stairs and out of that building, are all
matters which he can decide for himself in that present moment, for
which he will also reap the results. Even though the action of
walking up the stairs may still be influencing him (for example,
with his strength sapped he may be unable to function efficiently
in any given situation), whether he decides to give in to that
tiredness or try to overcome it are all matters which he can decide
for himself in the present moment.
Therefore, old kamma should be understood in its relation to the
whole cause and effect process. In terms of ethical practice, to
understand the cause and effect process is to be able to learn from
old kamma, understanding the situation at hand, and to skillfully
make a plan of action for improving on and preparing for the
future.
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Academy/9280/kamma6.htm
/\