Hahahahaha...either way the Chinese govt wins...what
wisdom!!!
Wednesday, Nov. 21, 2007 By SIMON ELEGANT / BEIJING His Holiness
the Dalai Lama of Tibet greets the crowd during a speech at the
Civic Centre Arena in Ottawa, Canada, October 28, 2007
Sean Kilpatrick / EPAArticle
ToolsPrintEmailReprintsSphereAddThisRSS The announcement by Tibet's
spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, that he might consider changing
the centuries-old method of succession is a sign both of the exiled
god-king's advancing years and his increasing desperation in the
face of attempts by Beijing to aggressively pacify his homeland. In
an interview with a Japanese newspaper, the 72-year-old Nobel Peace
Prize laureate indicated that he and his aides were considering
several methods that could replace the tradition of searching for a
reincarnation of the Dalai Lama among Tibetan boys whose birth
coincides with the previous incumbent's death.
"If the Tibetan people want to keep the Dalai Lama system, one of
the possibilities I have been considering with my aides is to
select the next Dalai Lama while I'm alive," he told the Sankei
Shimbun in an interview published November 21st. That could mean
either some kind of democratic election among senior Buddhist monks
or a personal selection by the current Dalai Lama himself, who is
the 14th of the line. For 13 successive incarnations, monks have
fanned out across Tibet with relics of the deceased Dalai Lama to
try and find his next incarnation a boy who recognized the
objects and thus signaled that the Dalai's soul had passed into a
new earthly envelope. It is a ritual that both affirms and reflects
the basic foundations of Tibetan Buddhism, reincarnation and the
rule of a revered group of repeatedly reborn monks. That the
protector of Tibetan culture would consider scrapping a core tenet
of Tibetan tradition and possibly undermining his own legitimacy
are sure signs that China is solidifying its dominant position in
the decades-long standoff.
The Dalai Lama has had a number of international successes in
recent weeks promoting his cause of Tibetan autonomy not, he has
taken pains to note, independence and protection of its culture,
much to Beijing's fury. He met with Germany's Chancellor Angela
Merkel in Bonn and soon after addressed both houses of Congress in
Washington. President George Bush even presented him with the
Congressional Gold Medal, the highest civilian award the body can
bestow.
But despite those high-profile appearances the Dalai Lama is well
aware that time is on Beijing's side. "The Chinese are simply
waiting for him to die," says Nicholas Bequelin, a China researcher
for the New York-based rights organization Human Rights Watch. When
the Dalai Lama is gone, Bequelin says, supporters of Tibetan
autonomy will have lost what is by far their most potent symbol of
resistance to Chinese rule. Whoever takes over will have a
much-diminished presence. History tends to back up that judgment.
In 1995, the Dalai Lama chose a six-year-old Tibetan boy, Gendun
Choekyi Nyima, to take the title of Panchen Lama, effectively the
second-highest-ranking monk in the complex Tibetan hierarchy. The
boy and his family disappeared almost immediately spirited away,
many suspect, by Chinese authorities and haven't been heard from
since. Beijing later appointed its own candidate for the position
a boy, now 17 years old, who was prominently on display as a guest
during last month's 17th National Congress of the ruling Chinese
Communist Party in Beijing.
To counter this, the Dalai Lama appears to have set on finding a
suitable successor himself, one whose legitimacy is unsullied by
unseemly squabbles over ritual with China and who has been
handpicked to take up the advocacy work on behalf of his people
once he dies. Making his succession an issue at this time may also
be an attempt to tweak the Chinese sensitive about their
reputation in the walk-up to the Beijing Olympic Games in 2008
into taking a more accommodating position regarding the Tibet
issue. Unlike more radical Tibetans, the Dalai Lama has always
advocated autonomy, not independence, from China; and he has always
said that he admired Mao Zedong, the founder of the People's
Republic. Beijing, however, has consistently lumped the Dalai Lama
with the rest of what it calls the "splittists," or those who would
break up China.
But even if the Dalai Lama finds the perfect candidate, it may be
too late. Beijing has become more sophisticated in dealing with
Tibetan religion, allowing some interaction among less exalted
lamas on both sides of the political divide. More importantly, the
accelerating erosion of Tibetans' traditional nomadic lifestyle,
along with a burgeoning influx of ethnic Chinese workers,
businessmen and tourists, makes it likely that Tibet will lose much
of its unique cultural identity within a generation. Bequelin
points to the example of China's Muslim-majority province of
Xinjiang, where Beijing has spent billions encouraging tourism
notably by building a train line through the region's vast desert
to the remote city of Kashgar, connecting it with the rest of China
and improving the infrastructure to extract its considerable oil
reserves. Along with the strict repression of even the slightest
signs of dissent, the policy has been highly successful in
neutralizing opposition to Chinese rule.
In Tibet's case, similar tactics are being used. A $5 billion train
line connecting Beijing and Lhasa opened last July, doubling
tourism arrivals in the region. A forced relocation program that
will resettle tens of thousands of nomadic herders, along with
increasing urban migration among young Tibetans, will ensure any
remaining resistance dwindles with time. "It's never a pretty sight
when indigenous peoples run into the power of the state," says
Bequelin, "but China is unique in the Tibetans lack of ability to
resist, so the process of assimilation is much faster."