I think the general christian shouldn't be too narrow minded on
what neutral onliner commented, he is talking abt the evangelist
that commited in all this unwholesome deeds, right from the 1st
posting, he already mentioned that he is not condemning the entire
christian community, but the black sheep that claimed to follow
jesus's teaching and yet did all these temple destruction, killing
and so on. Unless you support what these evangalists have
done.
When I see this, I was shocked. I will call these acts as
terrorism.
How pain it is to see the scripture and buddha's teaching to be
burnt into ashes...
We need more people like neutral onliner to bring out this to the
public to prevent the same tragedy to happen again in the future,
instead of the wait-to-be-killed for the sake of peace attitude. I
don't want in the midst of meditation, a group of barbarian forced
in to destroy our temple, hurting/killing the people protecting the
dharma.
Now, I ask you, what is your stance on their actions?
Originally posted by laoda99:
And.......very ironically, the same person post niceties such as
this:
....
That's why he posted articles promoting interreligious contact
and dialogue, instead of religious conflict. If he is an
anti-christ like what you have label him as, why he even bother to
post this picture.
If that is your definition of anti-christ, pls count me in.
Maybe you should learn from our muslim friends in singapore. For
example, there are terrorists who claimed to be muslim.
They created bomb blast, hijack plane and so on. But they are not
supported by the local muslim here just because they are of the
same religion. You get what I meant? A christian judge shouldn't
set free a christian raper even he has repented using the christian
way.
Originally posted by laoda99:
2. Haha....he phrase very good liao.....he is very clever...
3. Refer back to 2. I find that his phrasing and disclaimers are
very good. But a few posts by him as pasted above still reveal that
he is anti-christian inside him.
In my opinion, neutral onliner has been very tactful in his
words, sometimes to the extent of causing some incomplete
statement.
If I were him, I will list down more things to elaborate, I heard a
lot of bible hyprocrites from ex-christians including my dad.
If you want to know, I don't mind to share with you. For your info,
the romans catholics no longer swears by truth of the bible. Are
you going to scold them and resort to personal attack just like
what you did here.
I suggest that we all cool down and discuss point by point, like
which evangalist act is right/wrong, which statement from who need
rephrase all this, y temple should be closed down.
Or you want to do it in christian forum to get more christian's
comments or even irc so public can't see the discussion.
What do you think?
