[b]yes. evidences are provided by 'Scienc'-tists. ppl are not
scientists themselves, so very difficult to understand, hence the
scrutinization.
You are not making your self clear here.
[quote]we also hope you understand that it is not a
question of everything need evidences. do u need evidences to prove
that you are human? born under who and who? evidences to study,
sleep, live etcs? everything need evidences can be a problem too.
might as well commit sucide. all living things have this common aim
to be happy. work on that. So what is your point here? You
do not know whether you are human or chimpanzee?
it's like we are shot by a poison arrow. and one still
want to find out who shoot the arrow and who made it etcs etcs.
it'll be too late. we said hello...threat the wound/pain
first.
And get a quack doctor who will kill you instead of treat it or
get a medical doctor to treat it? Use what type of treatment?
Delusion, imagination or well tested and well researched
medicine?
tried not to compare Buddhadharma with 'what u known as
other religions'. Buddhadharma is something that the more you study
it, the deeper it becomes, the more profound you find it to be.
This is a quality unique to Buddhadharma. it's not static or
dogmatic. With other teachings, the more you study them, the
lighter they become. they become static.
/\
And on what basis you make that claim? It is more likely that
the more you study the more you become brainwashed? The more you
study the more you depend on superstitions and not not on reality
and well founded claims?
