Tang insisted that the "shit-pot cover" must be lifted from
parliament to expose the inner goings on.The public for instance
should know how much each MP was worth and where and how he or she
made their money. He said, with PAP ministers getting such high
salaries, what we have in Singapore is "legalised corruption".
Asked about the charges of chauvinism levied against him by the
ruling party, Tang said that the basic problem with his candidacy
was that he was able to move the Chinese ground. Although he was in
social contact with many of the PAP leaders, when he contested in
the general elections, they branded him as anti-Christian and a
Chinese chauvinist.
This was calculated to push the minorities and
the English-educated Christians away from him. More importantly to
also cause dissension among the Chinese community. From a public
relations point of view, the Chinese community would not want to
come out looking like a chauvinist in multi-ethnic
Singapore.
Thus painting him as a multi-chauvinist was a
strategy the PAP adopted as Tang was perceived as an important
political threat to the regime's hold on
power. When asked whether there are other
Chinese leaders that might take over from where he left off, he
said that presently most were scared and were not prepared to stand
up in a public way against the PAP.
Nevertheless, he said the Chinese as well as the other
minorities needed to reclaim control from the PAP, as the ruling
party rhetoric marginalises everyone who explores the ethnic issue
as attempting to sow discord and chaos. In fact by continually
painting the discussion of religion and ethnicity as taboo
subjects, the PAP maintains the upper hand on how it harnesses such
issues for its own political advantage.
http://www.thinkcentre.org/article.cfm?ArticleID=43