Sat, Mar 20, 2010 The Jakarta
Post/Asia News Network
The office
jungle
In The Screwtape Letters, C.S. Lewis describes hell as a place
'where everyone has a grievance and ' lives the deadly serious
passions of envy, self-importance and resentment'. From that
description, hell sounds a whole lot like the typical workplace.
Studies show 80 percent of offices around the world display the
all-too-obvious signs of dysfunction. Maggie
Tiojakin gives some pointers on making it through the
office jungle.
It's moving day.
'Yulina' has been promoted to the position of new regional manager
of an international shipping company's Jakarta office. There are
bouquets of congratulatory flowers crowding her desk, chair and
floor, swamping her already cramped tiny cubicle that sits among
dozens of identical gray cubicles manned by her soon-to-be
ex-colleagues.
With their eyes boring holes in her back, Yulina methodically packs
her belongings into boxes. She knows what's on her colleagues'
minds. She's been made aware of it for the past three weeks, ever
since two senior executives at the company announced her promotion
in a mass-mailed memo, congratulating her and urging others to do
likewise.
Unfortunately, most of her colleagues aren't in a congratulatory
mood. They don't think she deserves it. A rumor's spreading that
she used 'special measures' to land her promotion.
'It's unfortunate that the people I used to confide in suddenly
turned on me like this,' Yulina says, describing the scene of her
departure from the third-floor office. 'But I understand how they
feel and I recognize the resentment, because I used to be the
same.'
At 37, Yulina is no stranger to the office politics in which
employees are often mired. But she admits that even after more than
a decade of experience, she's still learning how to take it all in
stride.
Many of the issues that corporate employees need to hash out with
each other, she says, are directly attributable to the nature of
office competition, which sometimes leads to greed, gossip and
unfair assumptions.
'The way these competitions are set up is the root of the problem,'
Yulina says. 'Valuing individual achievements over group
achievements is not necessarily an exemplary team-building move.
Because when you lose that sense of togetherness, you lose a sense
of belonging.'
Even so, says psychologist Ratih Ibrahim, competition in the
workplace is not only necessary ' it's inevitable.
'As companies jostle for the lead in their respective industries,
employees have to join in the competition,' she says. 'I think it
can be a great opportunity for employees to improve their skills by
learning how to be more creative and efficient at what they
do.'
Inherent in this is the notion that as the competition intensifies,
so does the risk to the workplace dynamics.
'There's always that risk of over-intensifying the whole idea of
having a competition, driving employees to lose their humanity in
the process,' Ratih adds.
Pitted against one another, even the least ambitious individual
will eventually join the race and play the necessary hardball to
reach the top. The corollary is that this qualifies as a good
thing, because what matters is that people are striving toward
success, regardless of what ignites it. When it comes to team
morale, however, such fierce competition among team members can be
lethal.
Over the years, competition in the workplace has gotten very bad
press. While employees do seem to perform better in a competitive
spirit, they also have the tendency to get overstressed, overworked
and overzealous. Depending on their personality, it is not uncommon
for employees to do everything in their power to win and land
themselves the incentives promised for the completion of a given
task. Some incentives are in cash; others, in promotions.
Nevertheless, some competitions are ingrained in the corporate
structure, even with no incentives promised.
'Nita' has for the past
three years worked as a junior editor at a Singapore-based
publication geared toward women. An attractive woman with an edgy
personality, Nita is not the type of person who quickly fades into
her surroundings simply because she has a desk that looks exactly
like everyone else's. In fact, she likes to stand out, speak her
mind and keep her business to herself. So it didn't surprise her
that on her first day at the office there was some friction between
her and the rest of the junior staff.
'I'm a very competitive person because I like to excel in what I
do,' she says. 'And I know a lot of people see this as a negative
thing, but I think it's a necessary tool for surviving in this
[corporate] climate.'
Entering her second month at the magazine, Nita was called into
the managing editor's office for a talk. Her boss was impressed
with her performance, and promised her a tangible incentive should
she continue to excel in the next few months: a position as the
magazine's feature editor. Nita was excited. Unable to keep it to
herself, however, she shared the news with the junior fashion
editor in the next cubicle. Wrong move.
'She completely shut me out,' Nita says, raising her voice to
emphasize her frustration. 'And the day after that, she asked to
move to a different desk. Unbelievable!'
What occurred the day after is what Nita likes to describe as
the icing - or rather the frosting - on the cake. Pretty soon,
everyone treated her as though she was a leper, with the exception
of her managing editor, who thought such behavior among her
colleagues 'absolutely acceptable' in light of Nita's exceptional
achievements so early on in the job. It was normal, the managing
editor assured her, that others would envy her. She should take it
as a compliment.
'I love to compete,' Nita says. 'But I hate going against people
who can't compete healthily.'
However, not every workplace has the same competitive nature
woven into its fabric. Some professional environments actually lack
such competitiveness; in these offices, the driving force behind
quality work always comes down to solid teamwork. When everyone is
of equal status, there's no sense in working alone or getting ahead
of the pack.
Karen is a 29-year-old purchasing manager at a small company
that sells electronic spare parts to various manufacturing
companies in Java. Along with four other staff, Karen works
nine-to-five Mondays to Fridays from the second floor of a
three-story rukan (home-office), toiling away on worksheets.
On Saturdays, she goes out with her colleagues, either for some
karaoke or to eat at their favorite all-you-can-eat Japanese
restaurant. The five of them consider themselves a team both in and
out of the office. They know each other's families, often go out
together, and stand by each other when their employer, a vocal
sixty-something man with a penchant for yelling, comes trotting
into the office on days when sales are slow.
'In smaller companies like ours, the staff have a better sense
of what makes a team, because we work closely with each other,'
Karen says. 'I know the personality of everyone in this room like
the back of my hand. I'll vouch for their integrity in a heartbeat.
That's how close we are.'
In other words, no misgivings whatsoever?
'I can't speak for the others,' she says. 'But for me
personally, there have never been any misgivings about the
others.'
Would it be right, then, to assume that the smaller the
workplace environment, the less friction there is among the
employees'
Not really, says Patrick Lencioni, author of The Five
Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable. In his best seller,
Lencioni says the lack of team spirit in a workplace has less to do
with the size of a workplace and more with the quality of its
leadership. Managers and heads of offices are generally responsible
for the way their employees behave in the workplace ' and it's
their duty to create a sense of belonging in this environment.
'Good managers who don't act like a team create a dilemma for
themselves and the company,' Lencioni writes. 'On a team, the
collective ego has to rule, not the individuals'. It's harder for
egos to run wild when collective results are your yardstick for
success.'
And then there's office politics. Just as with real politics,
office politics runs on power dynamics and strives to secure
advantages beyond what one could legitimately strive for. Such
advantages may benefit an individual or a group of people, and
often include access to certain assets. Thus in a highly
competitive environment, office politics may be the key to
overriding social systems in a workplace by turning one employee
against another.
'The key in every organization is to endorse its employees to
act professionally, focus on their responsibility and adhere to the
truth,' Ratih says of office politics. 'The rules have to be clear
for everyone.'
Easier said than done. According to Lencioni, 'A hostile
environment is often caused by a lack of trust ' where employees
and managers are particularly harmful toward team unity and
productivity.'
As a result, determined to prioritize their own individual
success, people generate dual identities of themselves in the
office environment; and it is not seldom that those who get
promoted to leadership positions are the ones who, on the surface,
seem supportive and well-mannered, yet who actually justify all
types of underhandedness to get ahead, such as backstabbing and
sabotaging their colleagues.
No wonder some people choose to break from corporate
environments and go for something more liberating: freelancing.
Working as a freelance agent no doubt has its own drawbacks,
particularly in an economic climate as hostile as the one we're
currently navigating. But for those who can't take the pressure of
office interrelations, what freelancing lacks in financial rewards
it more than makes up for in peace of mind.
Sofyan Jap was a graphic designer at a prestigious design
company in Denpasar, Bali. He worked long hours and was often at
odds with his colleagues and employers. After five years of
grumbling and bickering, he decided to quit and set up shop as a
freelance graphic artist in Kuta, Bali. His new business is running
slower than he anticipated, but Sofyan doesn't mind - he feels
happier working on his own.
'I never realized this before, because that job [as a graphic
designer] was the only one I'd ever had since graduating college,'
he writes in an email. 'But an office environment is extremely
stifling, and rather than keep me on my toes, it pushed me into a
corner. I make less money now than I did at the design company, but
even if they'd paid me double what I made then, I still would've
quit. I just can't believe it took me so long.'
Ade Chandra, a regional sales representative at a software
company in Singapore, is also quitting her US$2,300-a-month job
($3,216) to become a freelance marketing consultant operating
from her Jakarta home. This is after three years of working 12-hour
days in the city-state.
'I'm completely burned out,' she says over instant messenger.
'The job is OK, and the pay is great - but I can't take another day
of this office drama. I can't work with passive-aggressive types,
they exhaust me. Unfortunately, where I work, everyone is severely
passive-aggressive!'
Even so, according to Ratih, people should be careful about
projecting their own lackluster attitude onto others. She says
sometimes it's better to look inside ourselves rather than point
fingers at others.
'I believe employees should be able to make their own decisions
and act accordingly,' she says. 'They shouldn't blame others for
their discomfort and/or failure. You could change your career and
office six, seven times, and you'd still have the same problems
because your problem, ultimately, is with yourself.'
Yulina agrees. Now comfortably settled in her new office on the
ninth floor of the company tower in Jakarta's central business
district, Yulina is of the opinion that, 'How we look inside
ourselves is proportionate to how we look at other people. The real
battle here is not against our colleagues, but against our own
insecurities. Can we do what we set out to do? Can we lose
gracefully? Win gracefully?'
She pauses, then adds, 'My personal motto is to never dwell on
something too long. There's never a good time to dwell; but it's
always a good time to get a move on.'
THOSE CUBICLE CONFLICTS
Office warfare is notoriously common. A persistent issue in
worldwide offices is the act of bullying, whereby an individual is
made to feel uncomfortable based on rank, status, gender, race or
religion.
Studies by various research organizations across the United
States, Canada and Europe in 2008 show more than 13 percent of
employees are bullied in their workplace, while 24 percent have
experienced being bullied in the past.
The studies also show more than 12 percent of employees
constantly witness others being bullied, while on the whole, one in
10 employees experiences workplace bullying on a regular basis.
As with schools, the workplace also has its bullies. And while
it may seem harmless at first glance, office bullying has been
categorized as one of the more damaging aspects of corporate
culture. Because of this, several countries have passed legislation
on the issue - Australia, Canada, Ireland, the United States, the
United Kingdom and Sweden are among those who recognize office
bullying as a health and safety threat to employees.
Ratih, however, says there has to be a clear definition of what
constitutes 'office bullying' before action can be taken against
it.
'Sometimes what happens is we project ourselves as victims of
office bullying, when in fact we've allowed all this unfair
treatment of ourselves to continue,' she says. 'We can choose to
take a stand, and if we don't then the responsibility lies with us.
In my experience, the problem usually comes from ourselves, and not
from other people.'
MAKING IT WORK
Psychologist Ratih Ibrahim offers advice on staying sane in the
modern workplace.
Know your limits
It's always good to
stretch and see how far you can go beyond your regular duties and
responsibilities at work, but remember to keep your efforts within
reasonable limits. Knowing your strengths and weaknesses is pivotal
in any workplace, especially when there's a bully watching from a
distance and waiting to pounce on you the first chance they
get.
Keep it real
Maintain a balance between
work and play. Keeping things real at work is one way to keep you
grounded regardless of the workload you have or the stress it's
causing you. It doesn't mean you have to take a skeptical view of
your office environment or, even worse, become apathetic. It means
you have to create an internal harmony within yourself that allows
you to see your personal and professional self as one entity.
Row your own boat
Many renowned leaders
will attest to the fact that leading others is an impossible job;
but it's far more impossible to lead yourself. Acquiring the right
sense of self-leadership is an important milestone in
self-development, because it means we're able to exercise control
over our desires, wants and impulses. Once we've acquired this
ability, concentrating on the work at hand becomes easy, as does
performing passionately and efficiently.
A pat on the back
Self-respect is not the
same as narcissism. And giving yourself a pat on the back every
once in a while doesn't always translate into vanity. It's
important for you to recognize your own value, rather than try to
suppress it to be more like others. Having self-respect means
knowing when to give others the benefit of the doubt, and give
yourself some much-deserved credit. Bullies love it when their
victims can't tell the difference between self-respect and vanity '
that's why they always flaunt their strengths in your face.