I got. you need the camalla to boost your ego right just like
the kids with DSLR 
Yes, yes, I know all about your problem already. You're
just so wounded by your lack of knowledge from the last time
(remember calling a 5D a "professional camera"? 
) that you have a pathological need to come back
after all these months to try to claw back some credibility.
Besides, you still haven't gotten over the fact that I can
afford all these toys and you can't, have you?
Never mind - all is forgiven. Looks like you've done some
hard work trying to build up your pitiful level of knowledge, so
I'll be kind and address your misconceptions.
Oh me, oh my. ISO 1600 automatically means noise?
The fact that you're suggesting that there will be noise in this
picture shows how little you understand noise. Better go back
and read some more.
Yup, you read the settings right, but your assumption that I
went with f/5 because I had no tripod shows that you have no
understanding of aperture or composition.
It's not so much your lack of photohgraphic knowledge as your
leack of geographic knowledge that sticks out here. That was
sunset, not sunrise. Again, never mind. I'm already
aware of how little you know, and now you've also shown how little
you've travelled, so you're once again generously forgiven.
Again you don't understand noise. With the 400D, I could
possibly have gone up to ISO400 in this shot before noise became a
problem, but since I could rest the camera on top of a wall, I
chose not to do so.
Credit where credits's due, though. I was annoyed when I
reviewed the photos later and realised that I'd left the camera
down a stop. Whoops. 
For what it's worth, I've since learned about the hamster.
photo6: this one bobiah aperture shouls put smaller to focus
more of the scene but your speed at 1/25 already. thing is iso800
why don;t increase to 1600? you can get maybe one or two stops
dfaster speed. online posting lah full size this frame sure blurr
1
Not sure if you're familiar with the 400D, but even with that
light level ISO1600 would have come out grainy. As for
full-size posting online, why would I want to do that? 
photo7: finally one that makes sense but anyone standing at your
side with just a point a shoot can take a photo like that also.
your moderate wide 18mm focal length at this angle looks like taken
from a 35mm PNS
And your point is ...? Have I mentioned anywhere that this
shot could or could not have been taken with a P&S? Or do
you simply want to say something for the sake of it?
Again, did I say they were anything special? Anyone with a
polariser (didn't pick that up because the only thing you can do is
read EXIF data, right?) can get that shade of blue, so why are you
making a big deal of it when I'm not?
Yes, yes, you have a lot to say, but apart from the -1EV point,
it's not just meaningless rubbish, it's boring. I fully
acknowledge that I'm still in the process of learning about
photography, and the pros who I choose to invite feedback from
(yes, the ones who are happy to use a 5D without calling it a
"professional camera" ) provide useful feedback. While your effort is
touching, it lacks any value whatsoever, so I've wasted as much
time as I'm going to by humouring your laughable efforts at photo
critique.
And of course they're travel snapshots. Did you see me at
any point claiming they were otherwise? Now, it was fun and
all dealing with your distraction, let's get back to the point in
this thread, said point being that in this wide variety of places,
nobody makes any noise about DSLRs, so the TS is KPKBing about a
whole lot of nothing.
