Actually, this is top management decision, I try to object it,
but got no support.
Ironically, taxi and MDT belongs to taxi
company, they hv the right to change and adapt to condition change,
as hirer, one must follow and agree on the terms and conditons.
Cdg spent so much on call management, from hardware to software
to humanware, they die die must ensure it function within the rules
and regulations, as the managements in call centre rightly put it,
“there is no reason for you, to buy a good oven and let other bake
cake on it”.
However, Hirers are consider small businessman, no oblige to
company payroll and it profit, this line is still very vague in a
sense that, as a Hirer, I pay the rental, you, as a company, agreed
to rent out with certain terms and conditions agreed upon by the
hirer
.
Yet I cannot perform my entrepreneurship as a businessman within
the context of business involving ferrying paxs around
singapore.
So, the arguement here is, am I your as a freelance hirer,
whereby I paid my rental promptly, followed LTA regulations and appearance rules as stimulated by the
company, why then, I cannot increase my profit as a hirer in a
legal means.
