Let the jury decides .
The false accusation will not favour this lady .
She crossed the road like that , which is not supposed to , u
think the taxi comapny insurance will lan lan pay up ?
Also , in Singapore law , any injuries to any party , Police
assistant is a must , and vehicle involve must not moved .
So in this case , Cabby is protected , cos there is no evident
to prove that the taxi hit her .
If everytone can make a claim like that , then let me go and
make a living out of it .
See a taxi , bluff bluff fall down , and make a claim from taxi
drivers .
My taxi colleague , recently , also faced similiar issues .
It was a raining day ...
The Motorcyclist skid .... my colleague's taxi was just beside
.
That motorist claim my colleague swerve and caused him to skid
....
What case is it ?
That was 2 months ago liao , taxi company also dun bother to
recall my colleague's taxi for inspections .
I guess their lawyers knew how to tackle such issues .
No case la ... unless there is eye-witnesses to back his claim
.
if no eye-witnesses , sorry , no deal .
If TS is the victim , i am sorry for you . You'll not get what u
want .
Unless u really engaged top lawyers to fight the case .
If not , too bad .
The case dun favour you .
U crossed the road already consider illegal .
What case u talking about ?
As for the cabby , what u need to claim ?
U neither got injured , nor your vehicle got damaged .
Again , if u engaged good lawyers , u might just be able to do
it .