(Link
from Finding twin Earths is harder than we
thought,
Beyond The Kármán
Line)
Finding twin Earths is
harder than we thought

This
artist's conception shows a hypothetical twin Earth orbting a
sun-like star. A new study shows that characterizing a distant
Earth's atmosphere will be difficult, even using next-generation
technology like the James Webb Space Telescope. If an Earth-like
world is nearby, though, then by adding observations of a number of
transits, astronomers should be able to detect biomarkers like
methane or ozone. Credit: David A. Aguilar (CfA)
Friday, March 20,
2009
Does a twin Earth exist somewhere in our galaxy? Astronomers are
getting closer and closer to finding an Earth-sized planet in an
Earth-like orbit. NASA's Kepler spacecraft just launched to find
such worlds. Once the search succeeds, the next questions driving
research will be: Is that planet habitable? Does it have an
Earth-like atmosphere? Answering those questions will not be
easy.
Due to its large mirror and location in outer space, the James Webb
Space Telescope (scheduled for launch in 2013) will offer
astronomers the first real possibility of finding those answers. In
a new study, Lisa Kaltenegger (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for
Astrophysics) and Wesley Traub (Jet Propulsion Laboratory) examined
the ability of JWST to characterize the atmospheres of hypothetical
Earth-like planets during a transit, when part of the light of the
star gets filtered through the planet's atmosphere. They found that
JWST would be able to detect certain gases called biomarkers, such
as ozone and methane, only for the closest Earth-size worlds.
"We'll have to be really lucky to decipher an Earth-like planet's
atmosphere during a transit event so that we can tell it is
Earth-like," said Kaltenegger. "We will need to add up many
transits to do so - hundreds of them, even for stars as close as 20
light-years away."
"Even though it's hard, it will be an incredibly exciting endeavor
to characterize a distant planet's atmosphere," she added.
In a transit event, a distant, extrasolar planet crosses in front
of its star as seen from Earth. As the planet transits, gases in
its atmosphere absorb a tiny fraction of the star's light, leaving
fingerprints specific to each gas. By splitting the star's light
into a rainbow of colors or spectrum, astronomers can look for
those fingerprints. Kaltenegger and Traub studied whether those
fingerprints would be detectable by JWST.
Their study has been accepted for publication in the Astrophysical
Journal and is available online.
The transit technique is very challenging. If Earth were the size
of a basketball, the atmosphere would be as thin as a sheet of
paper, so the resulting signal is incredibly tiny. Moreover, this
method only works when the planet is in front of its star, and each
transit lasts for a few hours at most.
Kaltenegger and Traub first considered an Earth-like world orbiting
a Sun-like star. To get a detectable signal from a single transit,
the star and planet would have to be extremely close to Earth. The
only Sun-like star close enough is Alpha Centauri A. No such world
has been found yet, but technology is only now becoming capable of
detecting Earth-sized worlds.
The study also considered planets orbiting red dwarf stars. Such
stars, called type M, are the most abundant in the Milky Way - far
more common than yellow, type G stars like the Sun. They are also
cooler and dimmer than the Sun, as well as smaller, which makes
finding an Earth-like planet transiting an M star easier.
An Earth-like world would have to orbit close to a red dwarf to be
warm enough for liquid water. As a result, the planet would orbit
more quickly and each transit would last a couple of hours to mere
minutes. But it would undergo more transits in a given amount of
time. Astronomers could improve their chances of detecting the
atmosphere by adding the signal from several transits, making red
dwarf stars appealing targets because of their more frequent
transits.
An Earth-like world orbiting a star like the Sun would undergo a
10-hour transit once every year. Accumulating 100 hours of transit
observations would take 10 years. In contrast, an Earth orbiting a
mid-sized red dwarf star would undergo a one-hour transit once
every 10 days. Accumulating 100 hours of transit observations would
take less than three years.
"Nearby red dwarf stars offer the best possibility of detecting
biomarkers in a transiting Earth's atmosphere," said
Kaltenegger.
"Ultimately, direct imaging - studying photons of light from the
planet itself - may prove a more powerful method of characterizing
the atmosphere of Earth-like worlds than the transit technique,"
said Traub.
Both NASA's Spitzer and Hubble Space Telescopes have studied the
atmospheric compositions of extremely hot, gas-giant extrasolar
planets. The characterization of a "pale blue dot" is the next step
from there, whether by adding up hundreds of transits of one planet
or by blocking out the starlight and analyzing the planet's light
directly.
In a best-case scenario, Alpha Centauri A may turn out to have a
transiting Earth-like planet that no one has spotted yet. Then,
astronomers would need only a handful of transits to decipher that
planet's atmosphere and possibly confirm the existence of the first
twin Earth.
###
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Thanks to Harvard-Smithsonian
Center for Astrophysics for this article