crazy monkey SG Is it right to post sumone's pic without permission ? Comment (25 marks) ps no reference to any particular person.
ditzy SG Its only right if due credit is given to the owner. Spoiling the picture, making it indistinguishable, totally sucks big time. Imagine the picture is full body, but only can see the legs, wtf?! jian zi si wu ru wo!
crazy monkey SG depends lor if its pic taken from other website i wun give a damn since its oredi in the public domain. but not pic tats meant to be private such as those outings one.
iveco SG Sometimes whoever owns the pix will scream "PLAGIARISM" and demand that you apologise. It has happened before.
ditzy SG Simply put, if we place the picture online for all to admire, and some cock borrows and places it elsewhere for others to admire. Its my fault because I want to let everyone admire it in the first place.
Oyster Omelette SG I only take pics from forums and ask permission before posting anything here. So the answer is better to seek permission first. (or maybe visit some wbesites that talk abt copyright rules)
crazy monkey SG just say sorry lor say sorry so difficult meh ? especially if you are wrong in the first place.
FireIce SG outing pix oso not 100% confidential i found my so-called outing pix (private) ended up with someone who is not even a member of this forum now u see why some ppl refuse to have their pix taken at outings
dragg SG all 3 of you have something against icy? all 3 are moderators. is that what moderators are for - personal attacks?
FireIce SG like clubsnap, they have a strict rule against hotlinking their pix are watermarked a few times some forumites post clubsnap pix in sgforums, and the Mod of clubsnap jumped at me and tell me about their policy. i investigated and agree to close the threads and warn the users not to use clubsnap pix again all parties are happy.