Lets carry your brain storm to another level.....
I assume to move an object in space you
therefore need ....(3 points)
Point 1 planet Earth, Point 2 the source of energy, Point 3 the
new orbit.
Further Assuming that you have Star Trek technology of
a "Tractor Beam" an energy magnetics pluse to move the planet. (as
you have mention you would have to compressed space to create
an artificial gravity large enough so that you can divert
the gravity to a energy magnetics pluse to move another planet.
)
but considered that .....
to generate an artificial compression in space create an
artificial gravity by pulling others space objects into the
temporary distortion gravity and the new orbit will also
distorted the current path of planets and moons, space
rocks orbiting the solar system.
We might in the process escalating an unintended
consequences of near Earth Asteroids collide with the Planet.
Although astronomical time planet Earth is stil relatively young
there might be the big one that has Planet Earth names on it. I do
not think we fully understand the knowledge in the Universe to
understand some of the consequences of moving the Orbit.
Shoemaker levy 9 rised stunning finding and questions about
the big banned theory......I would not be surprised the big banned
theory may not hold that much weight in this decade.
to move an object in space ,,,a initial force seems to be the
case as in asteroids and space shuttle experiments in space.and
seems like there is some kinda solar winds in outer space that tend
to push metal onto space stations
as the various planets orbit around the sun.....there might be
some magnetic pull around it...but what if this force was initiated
from the beginin of time and the force so great its still
rotating,,,whats n where is the source of this orbit motion?its
like some kind of wave motion thats pushing the planets in space.we
know the moon has not much gravity and its still orbitin so the
main source of orbit is posiibly like a water basin
filled with ice cubes and each moving in its direction from
the gentlecurrents thats pushing it.but where does this waves
or currents come from??the wind?circulation of air currents due to
atmoospheric action which in turn depends on space rotation onto
planet.so it all depends on space....if we threw a ball into basin
with the ice..it will shift and depending on force direction
made...it will be nearer or further away from the sun as to centre
of the basin
astronomically earth might be young but it can be accelerated
into a dead planet with knowledge in hands of buffons and mad
men.
in outer space experiments done by astronauts.....alot seems to
resemble where a body in space seems to float in intended
path unless acted upon by another force.so it would apply if a
nuclear explosion happens to space.as such we know very little
about space and only theories can be made as not enough experiments
have neen done in outer space.but if outer space was to be like
water and if we were to explode a bomb under water,,,,,air bubbles
would be seen along with tsunamis.the mass thats created to form
air in water by seperating hydriogen and oxygen in water would give
a replica of the atmosphere like conditions under water .but what
about space....its essentially a vaccum with no hydrogen or oxygen
to seperate......so how do u seperate a vacuum in order to propel
something like a planet in space thus changing its orbit as
well?
if a vaccum was like a bed mattress,,it would be seperated
by a great force and push stuff away.....but a vaccum is less
denser than a mattress so it should by right would need less force
to propel it...rather like a negative force in space in order to
propel stuff out there!then that would mean a vacuum bomb in order
to have a negative force effect in order to change a orbit of a
planet effectively..............
but then from the above.....what about air??could i move
effectively in the air by a bomb that implodes a force than
explodes a force out in air?
