You do realise that some of our single-decks, especially those
from dear SMRT, have engines that have higher displacement and
power than most of our double-decks?
Go crunch the numbers, chew on them, and come back to me.
If you did not bother to find that out, then you should
acknowledge that even I cannot conclude that our single-decks
necessarily consume less fuel.
I do realised that, articulated ones takes up lost of space,
have less seats make peopp[le satdnfor long hours in the joy rides.
so in a long run they endager add stress to or traffic sitiations
esp at peak hours, make commuters more discomfort with no seats
have to stand. all these for power engine efficiency? the accounts
and books look good, commuters noh bian suck thumb still have to
take those buses what can commuters do?
why deviate as if a simple search over the internet people dont
know keh?
NOW WE ARE TOKIN ABOUT SINGLE DECKS AND DOUBLE DECKS. WHAT YOU
CANNOT CONCUR IS YOUR PROBLEM. WHAT I KNOW IS THERE IS A REASON FOR
SINGLE AND DOUBLE DECKS TO EXIST.
SMRT AND SBS SHOULD MAKE GOOD USE OF DEPLOYMENT FOR SINGLE AND
DOUBLE DECKS TO CUT ON FUEL DURING OFF PEAK, AND MAKE FULL USE OF
FUEL EVEN IF THEY COST MORE PER TRIP DURING PEAK HOURS TO PICK UP
AND FERRY AS MUCH PASSENGER PER TRIP AS POSSIBLE SO THAT COMMUNTERS
CAN REACH THEIR DETISTINATION.
what so funny. cheeko peopleike you only like to send pm to
girls askin for meetup you think i dont know?