Wei, that isn't Spanish solution; Spanish solution is doors open
on both sides, one to alight and one to board.
But yeah I get what you mean. If properly run, scissors style
can be very good, like Brixton on the Victoria line in London.
And by third platform, I mean convert 2-platform
terminus. Like say too many trains liao coming into Marina
Bay cos got AMK, Yishun and Jurong East trains running, so build
3rd platform so can reverse more.
If you get me drift...
A bit la, forget the real term. If you say like that, then only
AMK LTE is Spanish.
Ok, but if you need more platform on terminus so that
the train no need to wait outside, then you have to do it either on
the side on above / below the station and not just slotting one
more platform inside it for obvious reason. If you put it on the
side, then the crossover from the side to the other direction bound
will require many crossovers (2 at least) and a longer travelling
distance of crossing over, which can be both jerky and time
consuming due to low speed and means, trains might still have to
wait outside while crossing over.
If you build it above / below the existing station, crossing
over impact when compared to the side is still there, but not that
much, but the problem is more on the gradient which is either
unacceptable steep or longer distance involved which faces space
constraint. In any case, that wont work and effectively kills
provision to extend it (Tuas extension from Joo Koon, olden days
Yishun extend to Woodlands etc).
Hence the solution is to use one like HBF, but now it is seldom
(Or even none) practiced due to someone tried to see and verified
that the crossover after HBF is a scissors with power supply intake
/ staircase access to that area which effectively kills any
southern extension out of it, which I had imagined NEL extending to
Pulau Semaku when the rubbish had land filled it by 2050 which
according to them (Government), by then it would be a recreational
area during my tour to there as part of Social Studies back
then.