I actually though about Expo and Changi Airport after I posted
my own post; the nature of Changi Airport and Expo is quite
different from Hwa Chong Insitution, a school, famous and branded
as it may be though.
Expo is part of the government's plan to attract more long-term
conventions and exhibitions into Singapore; the Singapore Expo
complex (both building and station) is an integral part of that
plan. Being a long-term plan, I highly doubt the government had
been shortsighted as to build an exhibition hall there and then
move it out in the next 20 or 30 years (or even as long as the next
50 to 70 years). That, plus with the combination of Changi Airport
(which I will be coming on shortly), the business park, and the
industrial areas nearby, it's not likely the government slapped
Singapore Expo down there for the short-to-mid term; unless there's
some upheaval in Singapore, or the URA decides to redevelop the
entire area en masse (the latter being almost impossible
given the nature of the industrial area, and the fact that Seletar
is being developed because space is running out there).
Changi Airport is a unique case. An airport, like a metro
network, is for the long term; plus, Changi Airport station is
dedicated to serving Changi Airport, and nowhere else. Even in the
unlikely scenario that Changi Airport does moves out, the station
will almost surely move with the airport, with the original being
closed down unless they find another use for the land or buildings
where Changi Airport could used to stand to justify an MRT station,
which could result in that station being renamed - again, an almost
impossible scenario. It's unique in Singapore's MRT system, being
completely dependent on one single building complex for it's load;
every other MRT station in Singapore serve a combination of
buildings and building complexes, hence why they need names
reflecting the area rather than a single building or building
complex in the area.
Hwa Chong Insitution, on the other hand, and as famous and
branded it may be, is a school, and history has proven to us that
schools, even the most famous ones, get moved around. While the
Singapore Expo and Changi Airport have very long-term and dedicated
plans backing their current locations, no such plans exist to back
Hwa Chong Insitution's current location for the long-term. We must
also be realistic about the scale of things here: both Singapore
Expo and Changi Airport cater to a very broad public, while Hwa
Chong Insitution's catering is narrowed down to the students
studying there, as well as the people working or teaching there.
Expo and Changi Airport's names are relevant not only to the area,
but to a large number of people going to the area; the name Kah
Kee, on the other hand, will only be immediately relevant to the
students and staff of Hwa Chong Insitution. Also, Duchess station
is not a station dedicated to students of Hwa Chong Insitution, but
also to people living in the Duchess and Watten neighbourhoods.
As for the part about Tan Kah Kee being needed to be honoured,
that I have to agree. But - if he was really such a great person,
why wasn't he honoured earlier in such a manner? Why weren't there
roads, buildings, or such being named after him before this? Why
wait until now, in this question of naming an MRT station (which
should take it's name after something already established, rather
than being the "pioneer" for new names in the area)?
On your argument about ignorant Singaporeans not knowing about
the great people in Singapore's history, I can't argue with that.
Many of the younger Singaporeans are indeed ignorant on this
point.
On the point of names being used as jokes, it's not every name
that can be tweaked as such - some names are more prone to such
jokes than others, especially if they can be seen as very obvious
puns or are obvious alternative names for something else. Your
cited example, Khatib, has no puns that can be immediately obvious
to most Singaporeans - possibly, when pronounced, it sounds like
"car tip" or "car tick", but that mostly happens after people say
the name over and over again, and sounds forced; "Kah" in Kah Kee,
on the other hand, has it's pun in full plain view of anyone who
speaks Hokkien; "Kah" sounds like "leg" in Hokkien, and this is a
pun that is obvious to many Hokkien-speaking people; the leg is a
body part that sometimes have dirty, negative connotations, and
this connotations can result in extremely disrespectful jokes on
the name, something I believe will cause Tan Kah Kee to turn over
in his grave if he knows about it!
On a final note, I do hope you do not take me as trying to flame
you, but while I do agree that there's a lot of immaturity and
childishness in this thread, your arrogant attitude and you going
around calling names will not help to turn them to your opinion nor
help bring mature discussion into this matter; in any case it will
only isolate people with your opinions even further, and will only
bring about more immaturity. You called others childish, but if you
looked at your arrogant attitude in your own mirror, you will find
that you yourself is not any better than the people you are
spitting on.
With all I have said, I think I will cease participating in this
discussion. My arguments, I feel, are enough fodder against your
arguments and for anyone who supports my opinion. I do respect
differeing opinions; what I have no respect for are immature
attitudes. If you insist on using such attitudes to counter me,
then this whole debate is effectively derailing from it's subject
matter.
Plus, I have more important things I need to attend to in my
life.
i must point out that it is unlikely for hwachong to move out,
unlike the raffles school.
Like what Gohby said, hwachong is built on private land, and the
land deed belongs to hwachong, not the government.
raffles, unlike hwachong, had a public land deed, with the land
belonging to the government, and thus, they can be moved as and
when the government requires the land.
and given the size of the 2 schools, hci and raffles, now that
both have merge into super-sized 6-years school, and given the
scarcity of land in singapore, i doubt that the government is able
to find alternative sites for the 2 schools, if they are ever to be
moved.
unless the government take back(a very serious issue if
that really happens, to claim back that big chunk of privately
owned land) the entire piece of hci land, hci should still be
around in bukit timah for a long long time. so, i guess ur
arguments tt hci not being a permanent fixture in bukit timah are
invalid.