Let's face reality.
So called 'Beauty' pagents means what it as campaigned - beauty
- of the outer kind. Kinda shallow, and nothing to do with EQ or
IQ, despite their vain attempts to ennoble the superficial
contest.
The only 'Q' that they are look for is Eye Q - Eye candy
Qoutient. Outer beauty is subjective, thus the more a contestant is
pleasing to the eyes, the higher chance she will win.
And in that contest, i guess many felt no doubt she is an eye
candy, worthy to represent the country as the most beautiful
girl ( eye candy ) in a world eye candies contest for this
year.
And thus should how she be judged. So long as one spare they
hypocriticism, stripped off all morality, intelligence and
inner beauty perceptions. And that should be how she would look
forward to a career in future. As eye candy till her beauty fades
away, nothing more.
As for crimes, she have to pay her dues. Everyone is responsible
for their own mistakes. It will be her reputation for life. And it
is up to individual or individuals to give her a second chance.
Second chances are never an automatic right of anyone.
Others can only plead on her behalf, as well as her future
actions.
So, for future beauty pagents, please cut the bullshit about
representing womanhood, intelligence, etc, etc. It only disparages
and demean against the many much more beautiful, capable, as
well as morally upright women of our world
Most of the beauty contest run on platform...it is what they
represent. So it is not about Beauty alone. And the Reality is that
Character, Values stand behind the "Look"
Miss SG is not going to be competing alone. She is going to
complete with woman representing other nationalities globally.
What I don't understand is that ........It would be SG
committees fault if SG did not put the "best" feet out to compete?
nobody is pointing a gun in their head until NOW....where is
Singaporean sense of competition?
The best thing could do is for the committee to come clean and
get runner up to replace Ris.