Err... yea i know. Thats was said after the match had ended
already... I guess Sven was just trying to find an excuse for the
thrashing they got... anyway, were you aware that City had a better
goal against compare to chelsea before the match? And they had only
let in 1 goal against the 2 best attacking team on the land?
Whichever way you want to look at it, both team started on a level
score, and i would like to think that chelsea went out to play
attacking football rather than they just got lucky or City forgot
to defend...
It really doesn't matter who brought the team together... Cos when
a manager takes over, he takes over the whole team... Good or bad
players, its up to him to mould them. If you still think Mourinho
should be credited for the win then are we also to believe that
Ranieri was responsible for Jose first 2 seasons as well?
Permanent or not, the one difference that i think Grant has brought
to chelsea football is... I think they are a little more attacking
minded now than when jose was in-charge... They didn't "close shop"
after taking the lead. Anyway, i still remember some senior guy
from Real Madrid once said put a shi t on a stick and place it at
the centre of the pitch thats was how boring jose's football
was...
And i really can't remember their 4-1 win over Liverpool... But now
i will remember Grant's 6 - 0 for a long time to come cos it came
against Man City... 
