pls prove which part not objective
from the first post, i have already lay out the questionable parts,
including significance of the number you had, strength of your
argument, whether they are objective or subjective..these are not
accusations, but rather the questions we must mull over, but you
have accused me of accusing you
never mind, i can let go of this
my objective have always been very clear
a) your views are personally your own, and not the whole
truth
b) either you support it, or you admit its your own personal biased
opinion
c) as such, its not the truth, you would not use such unwarranted
biases to openly launch stinging remarks against JC students
d) you are welcome to start an anti jc forum, i am all for it, but
do not leave your crap in other people forum
e) especially when they have expressed their grievances before
about your conduct
i never talk about your neighbours throwing shiat at your door
step, do not add words to my original post in hope to misconstrue
it
i already said, if you have personal biases against your neighbour,
do you stand in their house and yak about it?
no more than that please
for your information, chit chat is chit chat, whinehouse is
whinehouse, that is the difference
its not your grandfather ancestral home, nor your house, nor your
father's road, and there are decidedly a large numbers of JC
students MIXING with other people here, there was never talk of
divisiveness, yet your loose mouth refuse to let go
i am already exhibiting every ounce of objectivity, its just
that you refused to recognise it
