And which part of my statements are histrionic?
Flash floods and "desert fire" (whatever the hell that is) =
mass migration? That's so far out from left field it isn't
even in the same suburb, junior.
Your line of logic is so thin you don't have to turn it to see
the other side, and on top of that you're making up rubbish like
"desert fires".
I've been living here long enough to see bushfires coming my
way, and I ain't going nowhere, sonny Jim.
I suppose you're going to bullshit and tell me now that
bushfires are what you meant all along. Pardon the hell out
of me if I can't take you seriously when you can't even get simple
terminology right, much less the implications of the jargon you're
unsuccessfully trying to spout. Here's another news flash,
booster - bushfires have been around a helluva lot longer than
thermometers, much less this newfangled global warming humbug, and
we haven't had a mass migration yet, so there.
Only a fool would make up hysterical stories about "desert
fires" and turn it into some rubbish prediciton of the Apocalypse
with everyone bailing out.
Just because the slightest thing makes you run about like a
headless chook doesn't mean that other people are as flimsy as you
are.
As for global warming, I've read the research on which the Kyoto
protocol was based - have you? Do you realise that it's based
on absurd premises like third-world economies running like Los
Angeles by 2035? And then, of course, the flaming idiots who
wrote that tripe stand side-by-side with the protesters who say
exactly the opposite and demand that the same third-world countries
are going to be broke well before then, but nobody seems to notice
the glaring contradiction because they're all too busy going
wah-wah-wah.
The pointyheads who wrote that crap are as bloody histrionic as
you are, sport.
