a mother learns more about homosexuality and accepts her son,
and the whole family is happy. How is that bad as opposed to a
family who refuses to be open minded and end up making everyone
miserable?
How is helping the family to be happy, how is keeping the family
together considered crazy? considered wrong?
How is teaching a family to remain narrow minded and thus be in
misery be considered 'right'?
Do tell.
i think the point i've made is very clear here. Everything else
John the Baptist says or anyone else tries to say, won't change a
thing. The fact is, They're hoping other families will be miserable
because they cannot accept certain things and they hope others
won't accept it too, even at the expense of the misery of others.
That is plain selfish.
They expect gay people not to be gay, like they expect chinese
people not to be chinese. They expect that gay people should live
in denial, and never be as close as they can to their families
because they are in denial. They expect gay people to be miserable
because they themselves cannot accept that homosexuality is
natural. Dare I say it perhaps, that they can't accept that
homosexuality is natural because if they do, they have to accept
that their homosexual feelings deep down, are natural, which means
they're gays? U'll never know. Many of these most anti-gay of
people are closet gays in deep denial. Not all are, but many
are.
