Iran four years from atomic bomb, say experts
By David Blair, Diplomatic Correspondent
Last Updated: 6:50am BST 24/04/2007
Iran's nuclear programme is facing such severe technical
difficulties that it could take four years to produce enough
weapons-grade uranium for one bomb and eight years to deploy an
operational nuclear weapon, experts say.
Students hold placards; Iran four years from atomic bomb, say
experts
Students hold placards supporting Iran's nuclear right
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's announcement on April 9 that
uranium enrichment on an "industrial scale" had begun was
"misleading" and the time-scale for success is likely to be longer
than early estimates suggested.
"It's very difficult to enrich uranium," said Norman Dombey,
emeritus professor of theoretical physics at Sussex University. "It
calls for several different scientific and engineering disciplines.
Iran hasn't yet shown that it has mastered the problem."
Iran's underground facility in Natanz has space for 3,000
centrifuges, the devices used to enrich uranium. Iran has told the
International Atomic Energy Agency that only 1,312 have been
installed so far.
Once all 3,000 are in place, the machines must be fitted together
to form 18 cascades. Then technicians must introduce uranium in the
form of gas into the centrifuges. The machines must then spin at
1,500 revolutions per second to separate out the uranium-235, the
fissile material capable of producing the chain reaction unleashed
by a nuclear bomb. Weapons grade uranium must be enriched to 90 per
cent purity.
advertisement
But the smallest particle of dust - even a fingerprint - can
disrupt enrichment. Iran will have to spin all the centrifuges
inside a vacuum without any interruption for a period of about one
year.
If any machine breaks down - or if dust enters the system or if the
power supply is lost - the process must halt and start again.
Prof Dombey estimates that Iran will need about two years simply to
master the process of running centrifuges. Then, making allowances
for interruptions caused by breakdowns, it could take another two
years to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for one bomb.
Prof Dombey said: "At the moment, their programme doesn't
constitute a threat. It would constitute a threat if they were
enriching substantial amounts to more than five per cent and
they're not. In fact they're not enriching anything very much. This
talk about industrial scale enrichment is misleading."
Despite Mr Ahmadinejad's public threat to wipe it from the map,
Israel also plays down the progress that Iran has made. On Sunday,
Ehud Olmert, the prime minister, said: "Iran is far from attaining
the technology threshhold and this country is not close to getting
it, contrary to statements by its leadership."
An assessment by Israel's intelligence agency, Mossad, is believed
to agree that Iran is three or four years away from success.
On top of these problems, Iran would still have to master the
technology of building a nuclear warhead capable of delivery by a
missile.
Mohammed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy
Authority, has said that Iran may be eight years away from a having
an operational nuclear weapons system.
If so, America is unlikely to resort to military strikes against
Iran in the near future. The Bush administration may calculate that
time is available for diplomatic efforts.
Gary Samore, vice-president of the Council on Foreign Relations, a
US think tank, said: "Washington feels it has time to play out the
diplomatic hand because Iran is having trouble solving technical
problems with its centrifuge machines."
"The belief in Western intelligence circles is that a large portion
of these machines are likely to break if Iran attempts to operate
them at high speeds necessary for enrichment."
