My course's top students once told me
"In singapore, leadership - everyone also have it"
This came up in one of our arguments of cca results vs academic
results.
As my course's top students are mostly like 9 out of 10 are only
academic achievers, they have very poor cca records but because of
their results, they get chosen for competitions but mostly never
win anything.
I am only B+ student but I have a rather above average cca
record, I told them I can use that as leverage but due to the
course points system, despite have 2 pages full of acitivities
against their 2 liners, I have lesser points.
They told me straight in the face, "So what if you're a
qualified leader? In singapore, leadership - everyone also
have it"
Your take?
To me, they're all talk only. Half of them are introverts who
don't even dare to speak up to lecturers except only to pai ma pi
and get class participation.
A good leader need to have both academic & CCA - why
academic provide knowledge to lead, CCA provide experience and
interaction with people which leader need also.
"In singapore, leadership - everyone also have it" - yeap it is
all a matter of how many people you lead and who you lead !!! 1
person or many , clever or dumb bunch !!!