The law I'm talking about is a set of conditions where Nature
and Physics operate under. eg adding 2xH and 1xO produces water.
This 'law' is unrefutable and remains the same universally and
across eras.
On a more personal basis, you mentioned that Babies are happy
regardless of religion, education, politics etc .... Have you
wondered why ALL babies behave this way? This 'law' is universal
and we know our next babies will adhere to the same 'law' too. Now,
who decided this law that has a 100% adherence?
I don't think I see the problem wrongly. U ask why does H2O
become water, or why babies r happy and why certain things of
nature is like tis.
Well the answer is simple.
It is just like tis. It is same as saying why r there stones on
the ground or why black look like black etc. There is no higher
reason. It ends here. If everything have a reason, tat will never
end. U can ask why wat is the reason behind tat reason and wat is
the reason behind the reason's reason. And so on. In the end, the
answer is just... It is just there. Why not just cut the cake and
say the rock is there because it is there and water is there
because it is there and baby r happy if they r treated well (I said
babies already display emotion. I never say babies r always
happy)
Thinking tat must be a higher reason for certain events, is like
hoping there is a superhero to stop crimes. U just hope there is
something behind it all but in reality it probably is nothing
you'll realised that in order for earth and human beings to
survive till this day, there are millions and billions of variables
that are working together to support life and sustenance. Any
slight variation in any of these elements will mean instant deatha
nd earth's destruction. eg, any change in distance of the earth
from the sun will result in huge changes in the environment ..
either you are BBQ alive if we move an inch nearer, or you're b
frozen Airpork if an inch further.
The answer is simple. Living things adapt to the environment
earth have. If some conditions is altered, the living things may
become slightly different to adapt to tis environment. The way of
calculation backward for such a possibility is really flawed
I give u an example. Out of so many characters tat can be
typed with the computer, a book such as Da vinci code is written.
Wat is the possibility of the computer coming out with the da vinci
code ? 1 is to Billion and billions and billions. But the book "da
vinci code" do exist. How about the probability of someone like u
exist ? Out of the billions of possibility of woman, your mum is
chosen and out of the billion of people, your dad is chosen. And
they chose each other, reproduce at tat moment in time produce the
seed for u. Then out of the billion of possibility of things tat
can happen during her pregnancy, she give birth to u. Then out of
the billions of possibility on the environment u experienced, such
as your classmate and neighbour, they provide the environment for u
to become... u. The possibility of someone like u existing is
probably as low as earth supporting life or big bang, but u still
exist.
counting backwards of anything occuring is really out of
point.
It is worth understanding that when Einstein accepted the
existence of a Higher Being, he too made that decision with
"irrefutable evidences of a certain supernatural"
But the difference is he 'saw' those evidences with his brain,
but for you you are only relying on your eyes. ie He don't need the
naked eye to see it physically before it can become evidence for
him.
Well, there r a lot of intelligent people with different
beliefs. He can be smart and he chose to be agnostic and
believe something he did not verify.
And then ? Wat is your point ? He is he and u r
u. He marry his wife doesn't means his wife must be the
most beautiful and perfect woman in tis world.
