yuko-ogura SG which size is lousier for external hard disk? in terms of capabilities and functions etc.
ndmmxiaomayi SG Functionality wise, they work the same. Power wise, 3.5” needs extra power. And not to mention, it’s bulky.
Farmerseed SG The person who don't know how to make full use of either a 2.5" or a 3.5" is the lousiest. I think the thread title should be praised as "the pros and cons of a 2.5"/ 3.5".
Farmerseed SG Iif only microdrives can hit the capacity of a standard 3.5" and affordable at the same time, versatile too.
