ok also cos the 2015 chem paper thread writes an increasing no.
of radicals, as well as tys publishers
2015 sgforum thread :
it's not the
H radical, it's the Cl radicals than propagate the existence of
radicals. Due to the large no. of different possible propagation
reactions, free-radical concentrations will continue to increase,
hence increasing rate of reaction, until the rate of termination
reactions catch up.
This explanation seems really legit and chemically
correct
seems like cambridge wants the rxn to be exothermic rxn
increases rate of rxn.
seems like not many ppl thought about this
i guess the increasing no. of radicals reason is logical and
reasonable. so cambridge might accept it. i didnt rmb fully what
the Cambridge examiner report wrote. i only rmb they wrote the
emphasis on exo, and also writes 'few candidates mentioned exo' .
didnt write about increasing no. of radicals. so it could be right
or wrong. cos for other qns, the report did write about some wrong
answers written by candidates
So now, it could be the increasing no. of radicals reason is
correct, and hence cambridge accept (so my sch cher wrongly say
[cl•] or [rxts] is constant). And that's why im unsure whether does
number of cl• stay constant or not(want to know the real and
correct chemistry and happening ), after that one-time exposure to
bright light (as opposed to in outdoors in sunlight, constantly
exposed and hence radicals can continually form)
OR
the increasing number of radicals reason is wrong, i.e. number
of radicals is constant
No, this is my bad. My 2015 post is in error. I've just deleted it
away. Based on stoichiometry, for every 1 free radical generated, 1
radical is also used up in each of the propagation steps. The
initial flash of UV light generates a fixed no. of free radicals,
and the propagation steps ensures this no. of free radicals remain
constant, until the termination steps slowly uses them up.