Sorry but may I ask you something? I wanted a professional's
advice on this.
Considering that most of the 'top students' from 'top schools'
like ACS(I), RI etc. are in the IB programme, shouldn't the bell
curve be less harsh than >85% for an A1?
I understand if pure sciences require more than 85% for an A1,
but for mathematics I always thought 80% for an A1 was more than
enough.
1st, I am not a professional. My interest in the score required
was because got one year I got too many B3s.
There are still schools like SCGS, Victoria, Cedar, SJI (1/2 IB,
1/2 O), CHIJ St Nicholas etc etc you know? These schools have
80-90++% distinction ( defined as A1/A2) rates...
On the other hand, my students may have overestimated their
scores? But I don't think that is likely as this year's 9 out of 11
students report losses of <33 marks (aka 82%). My average
distinction rate is 70-80%. So what they feedback to me make sense
as if we assume A2 is around 80%, I will get 82% distinctions.
And if A2 is 80%, A1 should be around 85% no?