isn't that more suitable for SBQ instead?
haha.
For L5, depending on the question type, there's different ways to
approaching it.
A) Conclude it based on Longterm/short term
eg.. in the long term, complacency of the venetians caused an
adversed reaction to Venian's growth... short term effect is the
competition from sea rivals.. conclude that long term effect is
more crucial to leading to fall of venice
B) Conclude based on the most important factor
eg. Economic issue is the most important factor. Reason ( reinstate
your stand ). Compare it with other factor(s) ( downplay the
importance of the other factor ) Therefore, ( conclusion )
C) Weighing the impact level
eg. Globalisation is more of a help then hindrance to singapore's
survival. Reinstate point based on impact. Downplay the hindrance
to singapore. .:. more beneficial, hence, is more of a help then
hindrance.
D) How far.... type questions: Weigh the impact of all the
factors
Conclude for all the impact that it has on a certain issue.
Conclude which is the most important/all factors are equally
essential in leading... (eg. to the rise of venice) and none should
be isolated.
=) hopes it help