
The Glazers have turned down several offers for
United, each of which values the club at more than £1bn.
Photograph: Christopher Thomond for the Guardian
A secretive Middle East consortium has bid £1.5bn for Manchester United only to be firmly
rejected by the club's owners, the Glazer family, it emerged last
night.
According to information passed to the Guardian this was one of
several covert offers which have been made for the club, all
valuing United at more than £1bn and all of them rebuffed.
Despite the antagonism facing them from United fans, the
rejection of the bids appears to signal the Glazer family's
seriousness about not selling the club – at least for the medium
term. The Glazers are now talking about staying at Old Trafford for
another 10 years.
The news will come as a blow to the
Red Knights, the group of
businessmen who have been preparing a bid for United and have
carried out their activities more publicly. The biggest concern
will be that the apparent valuation that others put on the club far
exceeds their own, which has been put at around £800m.
The offer from the Middle East that valued the club at £1.5bn
was made towards the end of last year. It was flatly turned down
and the bidders were discouraged from returning with a second
offer, despite being willing to pay significantly more than
United's £1.19bn valuation in the Forbes football rich-list.
The revelation represents depressing news for those fans who
have been campaigning for the Glazers' removal and had hoped that
the hostility shown towards the Americans would help to persuade
them to sever their ties with the club. More than 150,000 people
have joined the Manchester United Supporters' Trust, the group
co-ordinating the anti-Glazer movement, and the protests have
become increasingly voluble since the release of a bond prospectus
in January that laid bare the Glazers' business model.
The Glazer family are said to be unmoved by the animosity and
thick-skinned enough not to allow it to affect their planning. They
are described as enjoying the prestige of being associated with a
winning team. That paints a bleak picture for the former United
director Jim O'Neill, now the chief economist at Goldman Sachs, who
had been hoping to move into power at Old Trafford via the Red
Knights, the group of "high net value individuals" that also
includes the former Football League chairman Keith Harris.
An offer from the Red Knights is anticipated in the coming weeks
but, even if it is substantially higher than the £800m initially
discussed, the Glazers will reject it out of hand and offer no
indication of a price that might tempt them to consider a sale.
This could be seen as a negotiating tactic, but the Glazers'
message is "thanks but no thanks".
O'Neill and his associates have already inquired about the
Glazers' position via Rothschild, the investment bankers who helped
the Americans with their takeover in 2005, and were told that the
club was not for sale. That position is unlikely to change. "It's
like having the most beautiful house," according to one top-level
source. "They could sell that house but why would they want to sell
it if it were the most beautiful house around?"
On the contrary, the Glazers are already thinking far enough
ahead to be talking about refinancing their debts in 2017. They
accept they could have been more open with the supporters and are
aware of the misgivings about the £700m worth of debts they have
brought to the club. They also hope to be at Old Trafford more next
season. Avi Glazer has been a regular visitor but his brother Bryan
has found it harder because his children are younger.
But they reject criticisms about the average 48% rise in
season-ticket prices, pointing out that Old Trafford sells out for
every game and is cheaper than Arsenal, Chelsea and Tottenham
Hotspur. Many supporters are planning to boycott the club next
season, effectively going on strike until the Glazers have moved
on, but the Florida-based owners are said to be relaxed about the
possible financial implications, believing it will make little
difference to their annual results.
They have also reiterated to Ferguson that he can spend
significant sums in the summer transfer market if he wishes.
High-ranking sources at Old Trafford have confirmed that Ferguson
is satisfied with the financial position and is genuine when he
says he has a strong relationship with the Glazers. However, he has
resisted the temptation to pay exorbitant prices and has adopted a
policy of bringing in young, up-and-coming players.
The Glazers, nonetheless, are satisfied with the financial
backing they have given Ferguson during the last three
title-winning campaigns, which also brought two Champions League
finals, and believe they would not have come under such scrutiny
had it not been for the huge sums of money being spent at
Manchester City under the Abu Dhabi United Group.
They believe the criticisms of their regime have been
exaggerated and have taken encouragement from the fact their bond
issue, raising £504m, was twice over-subscribed. They are also
unimpressed with the manner in which the Red Knights have waged an
aggressive media campaign aimed at undermining their ownership and
attracting support from the club's phenomenal fan base.