I disagree that the only purpose of the Singapore Armed Forces
is only to show off to our neighbours. They are also not there to
allow our citizens 'rides in multi-million dollar machines'.
I firmly believe in the capability of the Singapore Armed Forces.
The machines on display in 2000, such as the AMX-13SM1 and M113,
were to show both investors and citizens that Singapore is indeed
secure. Also, war is definitely NOT something which will never
happen. Just take a look around us today. Instability in Indonesia
is right at our doorstep. However, we remain confident that
Singapore is safe. It is the presence of the SAF that gives us this
confidence.
I also refer to the second post. I believe that technology can
indeed compensate for manpower in certain ways. Technology can be
used as a force multiplier. For example, if 2 armies of similar
size and skill were to face off, but one having only handguns and
assault rifles while the other has strike aircraft, helicopters,
mines, HE grenades etc, i think that the technologically advanced
force will score a major victory.
For an example closer to Singapore's case, just look at the E2C
Hawkeyes of RSAF, they buy precious minutes for our interceptors in
the event of an airborne enemy attack. This will give the RSAF a
higher chance of intercepting the enemy. It will result in less
losses on the part of SIngapore. The Lansort-class
minecountermeasure vessels of the navy are another big help. They
ensure Singapore's coastal regions and sea lines of communications
are kept free of mines in times of war. This will also minimise
losses. For an example from the army, let's imagine that an
artillary piece with radar support and another without, obviously,
the artillary piece with radar will locate and engage the enemy
faster than the artillary piece without radar.
I hope I have presented my take on the matter clearly and I welcome
replies...