What you guys thought about Henrik Larsson's debut?

Spica SG

Too early to tell.. might be first-match lucky?? But agreed that his goal was a beauty, considering his age too. Can't deny that he is a real motivator for the team! Very Happy

CKeer SG

Very Good for someone his age and definitely better den someone 5 years younger from the bridge dat costs 30 million. Mr. Green
Ooo.. Ah.. Larsson~~

Cheers.
C.K

iceFatboy SG

just a thought,
if Sheva is acquired by MUFC instead, would he be able to adapt faster?

just thinking out loud on the change of environment, the expectations, players, support.

dragg SG

i think he will perform much better.

man u style of attack has much more variation than chelsea's.

zocoss SG

£1.2m to keep Larsson

MANCHESTER UNITED must fork out another £1.2million to keep Henrik Larsson for the rest of the season. And if United boss Alex Ferguson wants the 35-year-old striker for 2007-08 as well, it could cost the Premiership leaders a cool £3m.

The Swede has initially agreed to stay at Old Trafford until March 12 before returning home to play for Helsingborgs. But his goalscoring debut against Aston Villa on Sunday swiftly led to talk of him extending his stay for two extra months. And if that happens, Helsingborgs will be looking for a hefty lump of compensation.

Chairman Sten-Inge Fredin said: The exact sum a deal like this will cost United depends on a lot of circumstances. For example, we would have to decide if we need to replace him in our own team.

Fredin added: It is, first and foremost, up to Henrik if he will stay in Manchester. If he wants that, then we are certainly up for discussions with United.

iceFatboy SG

somehow, I feel MUFC wants to get a new striker and a MF.
so I don't think the larsson is a long term solution.

but I may be wrong.. Cool

iceFatboy SG

if he stayed, hammered in 10-15 goals, and have 10-15 assists.. then this would be a worthwhile investment..

« Previous Page