LIBERALISM: BAD MORALS AND CHARACTER ARE
SECONDARY TO HOLDING THE CORRECT VIEWS ON ISSUES.
I have chosen to depart from our frequently asked question mode, to
pursue a connection that I have pondered for quite a long time now.
I happen to be a frequent listener of Rush Limbaugh. Now, before
all the nasty cards and letters start coming in, let me take the
time to make my disclaimers. I am not aware of what Mr. Limbaugh's
personal religious beliefs are. There are times when he seems very
eclectic and universal (Catholic) in his theology, and there are
other times when he seems to have a very firm personal relationship
with 'Jesus Christ'. Not with the Jewish Messiah of Israel, but
rather with the typical western view of the Savior. But, setting
that aside, he paints a very clear distinction between conservative
and liberal thinking, and has a very profound grasp of reality. His
revelations of liberal thinking are accurate and humorous. Let me
remind our readers that the ultimate distinction is not between
liberal and conservative, but between those who follow the God of
Israel and those who do not. However, for the sake of the
perspective of the next few teachings I would like to borrow some
liberal insights from Mr. Limbaugh and compare them with what I see
has happened to the Christian religion.
I would like to take some basic fundamental belief systems from
American liberalism and compare them to a very western Hellenistic
theology that prevails in modern Christian thinking. A belief
system that is lawless, full of cliches, ribbons, buttons, and
bumper stickers. A theology that is evolutionary, with little
action and a lot of intellectual pointy-headed fluff. An
organization that redefines terminology, appeals to emotion, and is
more interested in defending itself than defending truth. Well,
Brad that was a little strong. I am only telling it like I see it.
Are all who claim the Christian title guilty of this? No, not at
all. I have found that most of the leadership fits the bill,
however.
I am going to use Mr. Limbaugh's list of liberal definitions taken
from his second book entitled, 'See I Told You So'. We will cover
one or two subjects each teaching. I would just ask that you
evaluate carefully what I am saying, and take the time to honestly
think about it. If you are a frequent visitor to this web site or
have been to one of our seminars then you will have a better
background to evaluate my ranting. There is one thing that I have
taught over and over that I want you to keep in mind. The moral
corruption in our great nation does not spring forth from satanism,
the new world order, the new age movement, Democrats, Republicans,
Bill Clinton, Hollywood movies, Oprah Winfrey, or Harry Potter. It
rests squarely on the shoulders of a Torahless church and a
doctrinal system that contains a lot of heat and no light.
LIBERALISM: BAD MORALS AND CHARACTER ARE
SECONDARY TO HOLDING THE CORRECT VIEWS ON ISSUES.
The largest groups of liberal thinking in this country are in
Hollywood, the media, our biggest institutions of higher learning,
and in a handful of special interest groups. Unfortunately, these
groups dominate our culture. But one has to ask if our culture
created our religious institutions or did our highest profile
religion create our culture. Rush Limbaugh is more right than wrong
about his assessment of liberal thinking, in my opinion.
It was the President of this country in the decade of the 90's who
became the poster boy for issues over morals. It became obvious
that a large portion of the population was more interested in what
Mr. Clinton could do for them rather than his character or his
respect for laws and the constitution. The liberal media was right
behind him in promoting his politically correct views of abortion
and the environment, over his lack of ability to tell the truth or
even to obey the laws of this country. After unsuccessfully chasing
Mr. Clinton down for 8 years, the rival conservatives had to admit
that his views on certain political issues far exceeded his moral
standards in the eyes of the general public. This was verified by
the fact that even if Hillary's husband did not win the actual
majority of votes in each of his elections, his equally politically
correct vice-president did win the majority of votes.
So where did this "issues over moral standards" attitude come from?
It is this writers opinion that our view of the God we serve is
what establishes the foundation of our philosophy and behavior. We
live in a religious culture that has theologically determined that
Christ nailed Torah to the cross and that New Testament believers
are now 'free' from the law. It should be no surprise, then, that
drug abuse, child abuse, violent crime, suicide, abortion,
immorality, and crooked CEO's would be part of America's great
testimony. According to scripture, it is Torah that is the standard
by which we measure what is right and wrong, good and bad, moral
and immoral. But that is no longer the case, for YHVH's teaching
and instruction no longer has anything to benefit the people. Torah
had it's time and it's purpose, but we are in a new age!
Mal'akhi 3:14
"Ye have said, It is vain to serve God; and what profit is it that
we have kept His ordinance, and that we have walked mournfully
before YHVH of hosts?"
It is my experience with the 'Christian' religion and all of it's
tentacles, that my views on certain predetermined issues is what
establishes the validity of my 'faith'. If I am asked, "Do you
believe that Jesus is your Savior and that He died for your sins?"
and I answer in the affirmative, then I am a Christian. My answer
to other issues are what confirm my 'walk' with Christ. "Do you
believe in 'the' pretribulation rapture?" "Are you baptized in the
Holy Ghost, with the evidence of speaking in tongues?" "Do you
believe in the Trinity?" And finally the grandest affirmation of my
walk with the Lord, "Do you believe you can lose your salvation?"
To some denominations my view of the rapture is evidence of my walk
with the 'Christ'. To others it is my view of the trinity. The
answers to these questions are the 'fruit' of my Christian life. My
desire to obey the commandments of the 'Lord' I profess is
irrelevent. Morality and ethics as determined by the one who
created us is relegated to the Jews. As a matter of fact, in
Christian thinking, the more I desire to obey God, the less I am
relying on faith. Why the great determiner of my faith is not
whether I 'take up the cross' and follow the Messiah, but rather my
response to questions 'about' the Messiah. Oh, I get it, it's the
issues stupid!