Why you didnt move?
Please be considerate also to the cyclist.
You said it yourself, it didnt happen in Tampines. Meaning, that
area does not have a cycling path. In that situation, a cyclist
either have to be on the road, together with cars, trucks,
motorbike, and so on, and risk his life and limb, or, he will have
to tack on onto the pedestrian path. Why cant you be more
considerate ?
If he goes to the road, the drivers will be the ones who will
complain.
So, it looks like being a cyclist is like being a pariah, always
get discriminated.
Let's imagine that he was not a cyclist for a moment, and that
he did not ring the bicycle bell. Lets say he is a pedestrian who
said "excuse me" with his mouth. Will you give way to him?
Consideration has to go both ways. Were the cyclist being
considerate when he rang his bell impatiently to force and
intimidate pedestrian into giving ways when the pedestrian was
supposed to have the rights of way on the pedestrian walkway?
What he should have done on that NARROW walkway was to
alight and to push his bicycle. Not
to continue cycling on it and sounding the bell at
pedestrian, expecting others to give way... Giving way to him might
just gave him the flawed idea that he has the rights of way when he
dont... It's the attitude that matters. If he had
alighted and pushed his bicycle.. I would surely have given
way to him if he was to say 'excuse me'. But no way would I give
way if he just expects me to give way so that he can conveniently
and comfortably carrying on with his cycling... This is so
dangerous. What if somebody got knocked down or got injured when
the cyclist tried to squeeze through the crowd?