Those tabloid ain't got a clue whatsoever...if you even bother
to calculate, Liverpool spent around 40m+ since FSG took over...and
the most important thing is that they actually trimmed the players
wages as well...
I don't think that's their point, they don't bother at how
much one bring in from selling... Cos it's not a compulsory to
spend when you sell right?
They just see how much you keep spending... Just like United
didn't spent the lump sum of Ronaldo's transfer fee at once... Or
Newcastle hardly even touch the windfall they got from Andy
Carroll's fee to Pool...
Spend. spend, spend seems to suggest how much you keep spending
rather than how much you earn right? And to be fair, Pool have
spent a lot since the start of this year no?
And on your "most important thing" statement, I am not too
sure if they have trimmed any of the wages as Bellamy's taken
over Cole's package... Also we are not too sure if Pool are
still footing part of Cole's salary or not as French clubs normally
don't pay very high wages... Aquilani is still similar to last
season on loan so don't include... same case with Konchesky's
too...
So, maybe only Torres, Poulsen, Ngog, Kyrgiakos,
Jovanovic and Meireles I guess... (Estimate about 100, 40, 40,
60, 90, 60= $390k per week) But I don't think they are paid as
much to the combine sum of Carroll, Suares, Henderson, Downing,
Charlie Adam, Enrique and Coates right?
Henderson, Downing, Adam these 3 alone could
already take up $200k or more. Enrique and Coates
together probably $100k... That leave Carroll and Suares...
probably 2 of the biggest earners of that lot...
So I wouldn't be too sure as the jury is still out on
this one... But I doubt your last statement could be true base on
the estimates agree?
