chelsea were very nervy and out of sorts.
if liverpool had played seriously i think they do have a chance
of winning this match.
is ancelotti that blind? anelka and kalou really cmi.
i hope chelsea get rid of these 2 in the summer.
anelka is very inconsistent. to me he plays like an attacking
midfielder not a striker. and the reverse is true for lampard.
but anelka has been important in several games when he gave
assists. like lampards 2nd goal last night.
kalou before stoke was condemned but he seems to have gotten
much better since that game?
most important, without essien and mikel, chelsea's true
defensive midfielders, chelsea is still good at intercepting and
defending. partially can be attributed to kalou backtracking and
defending when needed.
ballack is their other holding midfielder, very good at breaking
up opponent play and push ppl and fall down claim foul.
kalou is like kuyt, got high stamina and can participate in
attack and defence. definitely more useful than ballack now that i
think of it.
