And churches don't mandate that you go for faith healing for
certain conditions (like possessions)? You need to get your facts
right scientology allows you to seek help from doctors, or it
doesn't forbid it. It only condemns doing so on certain types of
conditions.
wow google provides evidence for you, unfortunately that's not
going to cut it. your evidence seems flimsy, you need to start
using someof those brain cells I hope you have.
many religions require you to go through certain processes
before you can officially indicate that you belong to that
religion. filling in forms and documentation is just another.
and more importantly, people believing in a religion have to be
forced to go through the processes? You need to stop believing
everything you read.
The law was perverted but nothing is wrong with the law? Could
you make sense please?
I deal only with facts, not fiction. "Possession" is not a
reconized sickness in medical science. Are you mistaking it with
split personalities or schziophrenia. That is treated with
medicine. Therefore your first argument has collasped onto
itself.
Let me use my following example to point out anonymous does not
care what you believe in, only what actions take place after
that.
SO, I shall pretend that you have no foolishly shot yourself in the
foot and assume you thought possession really existed! (Might want
to go for a brain scan, tumour might be present) . So , if you go
do (or don't) something the Church would condemn you for, lets say
you get excommunicated from the Church/light . Alls well, since we
shall assume it was between life and death you sook medical
help.
So you leave the church alone and scientology leaves you alone? No.
You're going to be outraged at the Church for doing that and you'll
most likely complain to the local media and online forums.
Now this would be probably still acceptable if you are say
Christian or Taoist. It isn't if you are a Scientologist as due to
the Church's "Fair Game" policy which perhaps you would like to
take a look at trusty wikipedia, which i'm sure you think is not
going to oooohhh "cut it", it'll still seem flimsy because you
simply don't have the brain cells to comprehend anything.
So i'm going to spoonfeed you because you have a baby brain that
requires spoonfeeding.
Direct quote. Which is quoted from the source provided which is
itself, a declassified Scientology document. I think thats epicly
flimsy.
The Church also has its infamous "fair game policy" in which people
who have been declared "enemies" of the church, can be "deprived of
property, or injured by any means. May be sued,lied to , tricked or
destroyed." Quoted from from HCOPL Oct. 18, 1967 Issue IV,
Penalties for Lower Conditions. This is no worse than the
Islamic extremist groups that are considered terrorist
globally
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) -> this is
TOTALLLLly flimsy man!!!!11111!!!
This would fall under why anonymous is persecuting the Church, in
answearing your question. (how bad is scientology apart from the
fact that it is new.) However , I do not expect a mentally
incapacitated person to agree .
And .. Is your evidence itself concrete? No. I see not one quote to
support your manna-thin evidence. Tell me a religion that requires
you to actually fill in the forms and documentations to go to
"heaven". You do not need documentation to tell someone you are eg.
a muslim or christian. You NEED that documentation to tell someone
you are a scientologist. Or else its a FELONY.
You said "The law was perverted but nothing is wrong with the law?
Could you make sense please?" .
You have warped my phrasing like how scientology has warped
psychology. I see now why you defend it.
"This is an utter perversion of the copyright laws, as the cross
itself is adapted from the Catholic cross. It is not an issue with
the law, never was. The law was perverted by Scientology."
This means, scientology found a loophole in the law and ABUSED IT.
No? Got milk?
L2p nub. Laws can never be perfect therefore it is the fault of the
organization ABUSING it.
Just so you know, Exorcisms are frowned upon by all churches except
the Catholic church. Look at the marina church incident. Its in
court now. Srsly, nubkake, l2p.
