LONDON (Reuters) - Premier League clubs have
spent a record amount on January transfer deals this year, despite
the threat of global recession and chaos in credit markets around
the world.
With nine days remaining before the transfer window closes for the
season, around 93 million pounds has been spent by English clubs on
new signings, already eclipsing the 81 million pounds spent two
years ago and the 63 million last year.
Earlier this month, Chelsea, protected from the real economy by
billionaire owner Roman Abramovich's cheque book, paid Bolton 15
million pounds for French striker Nicolas Anelka and spent nine
million on Lokomotiv Moscow defender Branislav Ivanovic.
Moving from Bolton to Stamford Bridge also made Anelka the most
expensive player ever, with a total of 86 million pounds spent by
various clubs wanting his services since he moved from Paris St
Germain to Arsenal as a 17-year-old for 500,000 pounds in
1997.
Rivals Liverpool spent six million pounds on 23-year-old defender
Martin Skrtel from Zenit St Petersburg, making the Slovakian the
most expensive defender in Liverpool history.
Liverpool themselves are the target of a buyout, with sovereign
investment fund Dubai International Capital widely reported in the
English media as offering their American owners 300 million pounds
for the club.
RISING REVENUE
John Williams, director of the Centre for the Sociology of Sport at
the University of Leicester, told Reuters the continually rising
revenue from television coverage was the main factor affecting the
record spending.
"Consistently since 1992, pundits have speculated that the next
television deal must be lower," Williams said. "And every year
since 1992 the television deal has actually been higher."
The most recent three-year television rights sale, covering seasons
until 2010, brought in 1.7 billion pounds for the Premier League,
two-thirds more than the previous agreement.
Rights for television highlights packages and overseas broadcasting
rights are negotiated separately.
"The clubs are happy to pay these sums of money because they
presumably feel that on the basis of the evidence they have, the
television income for the game will remain as solid and as buoyant
as it is now," Williams said.
Another factor encouraging investment is the financial reward
available for teams staying in the top tier and qualifying for the
Champions League.
Williams estimates that relegation from the Premier League costs a
club up to 50 million pounds, while the immediate benefit of
Champions League qualification to a group-stage level could be
worth up to 20 million pounds.
"The other returns are potentially much larger than that," Williams
said. "If a club can stay in the Champions League for a while they
can recruit better players, it means you get better sponsors, it
means you can raise your ticket prices, it means you can get people
buying shirts from around the world."
STRUGGLING CLUBS
At least one million pounds has been spent on 22 other transfers so
far, with some of the Premier League's struggling clubs spending
heavily in an attempt to avoid relegation.
Derby, almost certain to go straight back to the Championship
(second division) after winning just one of their 23 league games
to date, paid 1.1 million pounds to Blackburn Rovers for Welsh
international midfielder Robbie Savage and spent two million on
25-year-old Argentine striker Emanuel Villa.
Among other clubs looking over their shoulders at the drop,
16th-placed Birmingham paid Everton five million pounds for
Scottish international James McFadden and bought David Murphy from
Hibernian for 1.5 million.
Fulham, who have also plummeted down the table after a poor run of
form, appointed Roy Hodgson to turn around fortunes at the
club.
He promptly signed Brede Hangeland from FC Copenhagen and a
five-million-pound bid for Watford striker Marlon King is still
being negotiated.
For now, Premier League clubs can be sure of a strong balance sheet
due to television fees and healthy sponsorship deals.
However, the next auction of Premier League coverage is due in 2009
and, with a global slowdown looming, may not bring in as much
money.
"They (clubs) may look at the wider economic picture and maybe
begin to question their assumptions," Williams said.