Actually before the take-over, Pool was reported to be in debts
already to the tune of $80 million pounds... What the takeover did
was only increase their debts to almost $300m.
So actually, no difference. They didn't have the money to buy
players above $15m before the takeover but at least they could
still spend $20m on a striker this season...
The difference i see between them and United is they were not well
manage in the last 15 yrs. They had an owner who was running the
club, who was just sitting back and enjoying it while United listed
on the stock market, got a qualified CEO to run its club and made
it into a business.