http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theological_noncognitivism
some key ideas:
Theological noncognitivism is the argument that
religious language, and specifically
words like "God" (capitalized), are not
cognitively meaningful
Some theological noncognitivists assert that to be an atheist is to give credence to
the concept of God because it assumes that there actually is
something understandable to not believe in.
As with ignosticism, the consistent
theological noncognitivist awaits a coherent definition of the word
God (or of any other metaphysical utterance purported to be
discussable) before being able to engage in arguments for or
against God's existence.
-----------------------------------------------
To be an atheist is to give credibility to the idea of "god"
when it actually is meaningless. Divinity and the supernatural are
merely spinoffs from social constructions which keep people in
line.
In the same vein, being a theistic Satanist gives christianity
credibility because it basically asserts that christ _and_ the
antichrist exists. (Note: do not confuse theistic satanism with
laVeyan satanism..laVeyan is a more sophisicated idea)
Choose ignosticism and theological noncognitivism today!
Acknowledge that arguing for AND against a "god" is totally
meaningless.
Otherwise, choose agnostic existentialism and atheistic
existentialism. at least realise that humans can have a meaningful
existence based on a common pursuit of science, humanities, sports,
arts, and universal brotherhood instead of chasing shadows and
worshipping idols.