Atheism is an abject
failure.
As
atheists we are in a unique situation. While we are ostracized,
marginalized, persecuted, prosecuted, abused and generally deprived
of our rights by unsympathetic regimes and autocratic systems in
the real world, it is in cyberspace where we can express ourselves
freely to some substantial degree. It is in this virtual realm that
we dare challenge theists and other proponents of illogicality and
come away truly victorious.
However, these victories,
impressive as they are, cannot but feel hollow. For all the
reasoning and logic which made us, dare I say it, ubermensch, we are unable to demonstrate our superiority
where it really matters. Dawkins and Hitchens might have made the
world stand up in recognition of the fallacies of religion, but is
this proliferation of truth and rationality changing the way people
really behave?
Sadly, the answer is no.
Superstition still holds sway. To many, atheism is a passing fad.
People remain attached to their cherished beliefs. After all,
knowing the truth does not equate its acceptance. Not only do
people want to believe in something, they need to feel wanted.
Religion provides a very strong support in satisfying this
emotional need, as evident by the number of support groups, cell
groups, social and community structures the religious have put
together to bind its adherents.
It
must be intoxicating knowing that ‘Someone’ will always love you.
That ‘Someone’ will look after you in every situation and never
falter in His efforts. To have this preposterous notion ‘validated’
by your fellow humans who actually help
you in times of difficulties while the ‘Someone’ never makes an
appearance must seem an affirmation to the desperate. What religion
does so effectively is to make each and everyone of its followers
feel special. Logic goes out of the window in the face of this
compelling emotional assault. It is an irony, considering that
rationality is painted over by a very real human need which in turn
is satisfied by an illusion instead.
This
is where atheism fails so miserably. Atheists do not help each
other just because they believe in the same creed. The theists,
however, do so because their doctrine specifically wills it. For
all our arguments and justifications we do not deign to help one
another because we take the point of ‘not giving a damn about God’
one step further to include ourselves. I see friends who are
Christians support each other within their own church and cell
groups. What do I see when I look upon my fellow
atheists?
Theist : 1 Atheist :
0.
Our
endless debates with theists achieve little. We are wasting
precious time trying to convince people who do not want to be
convinced. People would rather live a happier life believing in a
lie than accept things as they really are and being less happy as a
result. Reading about the articles atheists post on the Internet
makes me think that all these well-meaning writers want are to
amass as many hits for their sites and to comment favorably on each
other’s writings in the hope that the praised party, overjoyed at
being appreciated, would return the favor. We hide behind monikers
like ‘infidel’ and ‘heretic’, perhaps to impart some perceived
quality in our cause, but we do not back our words with concrete
action. I have more respect for the religious folk (the non-violent
ones) who preach their gospel and live their life accordingly than
for self-proclaimed atheists who cannot even be bothered to scrap
their addled brains off the computer screen to think: I am an
atheist. What does this mean? What do I do?
Atheism is on precarious ground in
this respect. And it is time to stop the rot.
We
must acknowledge that we are on our own. We have no god(s), no
temples, no institutions and nothing to rely upon. Social structure
and cultural norms, influenced to some extent by religion does not
give the atheist credence. In many parts of the world, atheism is
punishable by stoning. In more civilized
climates, a priest who incites violence against non-believers is at
the most given a slap on the wrist – he might even be lauded for
his sense of justice. But an atheist who gives
credible reasons for his rejection of religion, and quotes from
reliable sources – he is making ‘seditious’ remarks and persecuted
for being ‘anti-religion’. It is obscene. You can say that people
are treated equally in these modern times, but you cannot deny that
some are more equal than
others.
In
view of the many difficulties atheists face, I propose we take care
of our own. And we can do this through support
groups.
A
support group need not have a club-house or a fixed physical
location where members can convene. We can host a bulletin board
(forum) in cyberspace, much like what Atheisthaven is doing.
However, instead of ‘ghost members’ and people who pack only
rhetoric and little else, such a group must consist of dedicated
individuals who genuinely want to make a difference. While we do
not restrict the membership to atheists (the non-religious,
freethinkers, agnostics, even Buddhists - especially those leaning towards a philosophical
bent may join), members must be committed. As this commitment takes
the form of certain obligations, we want positive individuals who
truly believe in improving themselves and others. Atheism by its
own nature, promotes self-reliance and an internal locus of
control. All efforts should have an egalitarian spirit in its core,
mutual aid as its strength, and self-actualization its ultimate
goal.
This
is strictly an informal group. No membership fee is required. We
only ask that members make an effort to know each other and to
interact, preferably face-to-face. This fosters cohesiveness which
is very important because people tend to help their own friends
than relative strangers.
What
form should this aid take? At the most basic level, information
exchange. People who have questions can post them on the group
site, and those with the answers can promptly reply. Questions can
range from anything – potential job openings, which university to
choose, even where to get the best bargains! At a deeper level,
members can work on some task together or maybe enjoy a little
soiree.
While we encourage members to look
after each other’s interests, we do not look kindly to people who
join for ulterior motives. This is not a MLM
(multi-level-marketing) scam, nor is it a dating agency. Promoting
any political agenda is also a no-no. In a nutshell, the group is
similar to a normal theist cell group, minus the praying and
speaking in tongues. Think of it as a secular social network, where
normal people (without a faith) make friends and chill
out.
We
must succeed in this endeavor. If sodden theists can organize
themselves, it would be a crying shame if intelligent atheists
cannot even produce a similar response. The time has passed for
talking. Let us show people that we are capable of doing great
things, even without divine edicts… because in Humanity we
trust.
Liu
Weixian, Liang Xianghong
AtheistHaven
Singapore
[email protected]