China's current challenges are only too familiar
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
China's current challenges are only too familiar
By Eliot R Cutler (China Daily)
Updated: 2007-07-20 16:20
The author Eliot R Cutler is the managing partner of the Beijing
office of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, an international
law firm. He is also a former associate director of the White House
Office of Management and Budget.
John F Kennedy famously called Washington a city of "northern charm
and southern efficiency". Someone old enough to have lived in
Washington when it was a small and sleepy capital finds
surprisingly familiar the drama playing out in China these days
over the safety and reliability of everything from drugs to
drinking water to automobile parts. Like 33 1/3 rpm records played
on a 78 rpm Victrola, the music sounds different when it is played
at warp speed, but if you listen carefully enough, you can
recognize the tune and even pick out most of the words.
These are serious matters, no doubt about it. My wife and I are
careful about where we buy toothpaste and aspirin, we wonder where
the bottled water really comes from and we think twice now about
eating baozi and some of our other favorite foods. We shudder to
think about what is in the air that we are breathing, and we wonder
how China will save its rivers and streams from the ravages of
careening growth. But there is nothing happening in China today
that is fundamentally different from what has happened in other
countries - including the US - at other times. These are the sounds
and groans (and dangers) of a free-wheeling market economy
transforming itself into one that soon will become more regulated
and even more internationally competitive. Most of China's safety
and quality problems are caused by good people trying to do their
jobs in a domestic marketplace that is so highly competitive and
unregulated that it often accounts for nothing but the most direct
costs.
In many of its sectors, China's booming economy is one of the most
cutthroat in the world: Factories pare margins to the bone in order
to beat out their neighbors for orders and market share, and they
eliminate as many costs as possible. Bad ingredients are
substituted for good ones if they are cheaper and non-apparent, and
costs for largely external benefits, like clean air and water, are
not incurred when they are ineffectively mandated and cannot be
recovered in product pricing.
Even some of China's best and most responsible companies, those
with genuine ambitions to produce high-quality goods, are sometimes
forced to choose between losing money, market share or both. Caught
between Scylla and Charybdis, those that succumb and sacrifice
quality in order to remain price-competitive find themselves
disciplined either by growing domestic outrage or by international
regulators who refuse entry to shoddy and unsafe goods.
Does this sound familiar? Of course it does. Go back and reread
Upton Sinclair. Recall the sweatshops in New York's garment
district or the children working in New England's textile mills.
Remember what sparked the creation of the Food and Drug
Administration and, not so long ago, the Consumer Products Safety
Commission. Before he became a gadfly and a regular presidential
candidate, Ralph Nader was an important consumer muckraker ... less
than 40 years ago.
This country is now furiously engaged in a remarkable frenzy of
self-examination and criticism. As China looks at itself in the
mirror and prepares to face the world's markets, what should we
expect will change?
Well, past is prologue. Notwithstanding the differences between our
politics and our cultures, there is nothing so fundamentally unique
about the challenges facing China's market economy - particularly
in terms of domestic expectations and international competitiveness
- that we should be surprised to find its economy become much more
highly regulated and the national government endow itself with
considerably greater reach and leverage.
It happened in the United States after World War II, it is
happening in the continuing development of the European Union, and
it will happen in the Peoples' Republic of China. Corporate China
will make sure of that.
Consumer expectations and demands are only slowly beginning to have
an impact on product quality and safety. Truly egregious crimes of
corruption and official misconduct may lead to highly visible
executions, but these punishments will have only a limited
deterrent effect.
Real and widespread change in the Chinese regulatory environment
will come from two much more important developments. First, the
better Chinese companies, the ones with Western customers and
international ambitions for their own products and their brands,
will band together and plead for better and more effective
regulation. They will be joined by the Western companies
themselves, the ones with operations in China whose managers wonder
about the quality of the ingredients that they use, just like my
wife and I do. These managers, after all, already are under close
examination by their regulators and customers outside China. Both
the Chinese and the Western companies want and need a level playing
field where the worst of the price-bound competitors no longer play
with an unfair advantage.
Second, the national government will step in with rules and
regulations that will be enforceable ... and that in fact will be
enforced. Trust me on this: The last thing China will do is leaving
decision-making about its people and its companies to the
international marketplace.
However much China's has become a market economy, faster and more
dramatically than any in history, it remains a directed market
economy, and the new direction will be more uniform and more
vigorously enforced national regulations.
What will these changes mean for the size and shape of China's
national government? Like the federal government in the United
States during the New Deal and even more emphatically during the
two decades from 1960 to 1980, the Chinese national government will
grow much, much bigger, its regulatory reach into the provinces
will become much greater and it will discover that purse strings
provide a more humane and a more effective lever for gaining
compliance with national regulations than executions and
imprisonment.
Chinese companies and their Western brethren with huge Chinese
operations face two challenges today. They need to manage and
communicate their way through a series of crises - related to
product safety, public health, environmental quality, labor
practices and a host of other public issues - that are just now
beginning and that likely will continue to challenge them, at least
through the Beijing Olympics. At the same time, they need to learn
quickly how to help shape the new regulatory directions that the
government is bound to take, how to help educate government
officials about which rules will work and which will not and how to
make the kinds of strategic bets about regulatory policies and
their own investments that either will allow them to adapt quickly
and prosper - or that will condemn them to a quick demise.
All this makes a Washington lawyer in Beijing feel right at
home.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2007-07/20/content_6001227.htm
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2007-07/20/content_6001227_2.htm