Isn't the answer already in your
heart?
Why don't you tell us if you
really think it is true?
While, you have your rights to your views.
There are girls who are not able
to take hardships in life, and very often that is the reason why
they are not able to cope and survive in the working
world.
Is that explaination simple enough
for you to understand?
It is scientifically proven that females have a weaker mental
and physical capacity than males.
This is not a disadvantage.
Rather, nature meant it this way as females are to be
caretakers. That is why females are more
emotionally-orientated.
However, such advantages in caretaking does not applies to the
working world, of which this is a major disadvantage.
Furthermore, females have their monthly problem which causes a
varying degree of "emotion instability" and that could cause alot
of problems if they were given important tasks to accomplish.
And to add on, there are a minority of females who have more
flaws compared to others, for example they have the built in urge
to want a 30k ring, or simply put, materalistic.
If you look at all this flaws, wouldn't it be better if females
would become caretakers instead and fulfil their roles? Wouldn't
money be saved and put to better use if education is stripped for
them since it is unneccessary?
All they need is just to learn how to communicate and allow
their male counterparts to fulfil the "feeding" role. The workforce
part could easily be solved by the rising birth rate if they become
caretakers.
Wrong, cos men are not smart, capable, sensible enough to succeed
in today's world.
It is proven that women with education are so much more capable
than men in every aspects in today's world.
Haven't you realised that yet, or you prefer to ignore the
change of situation around the world today?
Who took care of you when you're young? Woman or Man? Aren't you
being ungrateful for the breasts that feeds you?
