put the matter to an end? i know its everyone's intention to
minimise flaming here but i'll rather he answer to the questions he
avoided, inclusive of the recent case and also not to show out his
"good deeds" here, maybe in private yes but not here trying to
create a good impression when his reputation is already quite bad
here. if his reputation here is good then that's another case. in
this case he can just say the bus was put out of service because of
an damaged floorboard, not saying that he told the BC driving that
bus this and that since he should know he will arouse flaming for
that.
if he can do all these, he probably will be respected the same
way we bus fans respect each other. i know some of you are just
sacrificing the tolerance and hatred for peace here. if he can
answer to all this and adapt to them, there won't be any tolerating
and hating of one another, there won't be any of such "putting the
matter to an end" cases and flaming will then really be reduced to
the minimum.
explain why it's HE and not I
i wanted to point this out until choco lock it 
