Like many maids in Singapore, Ms Dewie, 27, came here for a bigger
pay cheque to support her young children. She could endure the
backbreaking hours, even the repeated scoldings, but what made her
decide to leave was the closed-circuit television camera in the
toilet.
"Why are you taking so long in the toilet? Why are you using my
shampoo and not yours?" her employer would ask, despite not being
home at that time. Ms Dewie, whose story was recounted by
non-governmental organisation Transient Workers Count Too (TWC2),
then checked the toilet and found a tiny camera hidden in a
corner.
It is not uncommon for employers here to use closed-circuit
television (CCTV) cameras to keep an eye on their maids, especially
those left at home with the elderly or young children. They use
CCTVs to deter their maids from abusing family members or to ensure
that no strangers enter their homes.
But a line is crossed when these cameras are put up in private
areas, said the authorities and advocacy groups for foreign
workers.
"CCTVs should not be installed in areas that will compromise the
FDWs' (foreign domestic workers') privacy, for example, where they
sleep, change their clothes or the bathroom area," said a spokesman
for the Ministry of Manpower (MOM). "All employers must respect the
privacy of their employees, including foreign domestic workers who
work and reside in their employers' homes."
RESPECT WORKERS' PRIVACY
CCTVs should not be installed in areas that will compromise the
foreign domestic workers' privacy, for example, where they sleep,
change their clothes or the bathroom area. All employers must
respect the privacy of their employees, including foreign domestic
workers who work and reside in their employers'
homes.
Mr Jolovan Wham, executive director of the Humanitarian
Organisation for Migration Economics (Home), said his group
believes the presence of surveillance cameras where the maid sleeps
and rests should be outlawed.
"Even if the domestic worker is sharing her room with the children
or the elderly, such cameras should not be allowed because everyone
has a right to his privacy," he said.
Currently, it is not illegal for employers to install cameras in
bedrooms and toilets as there are no privacy laws here, said
lawyers. But if surveillance is done in areas where the worker
undresses, this could constitute an outrage of
modesty.
The MOM spokesman said: "In the event that such complaints are
brought to our attention, we will advise the employers to take down
the CCTV. Should the cases involve insulting of modesty, these will
be referred to the police," she said.
She added that complaints of intrusion of privacy are very
rare.
But welfare groups that work with migrant workers say they get
numerous complaints from maids about employers monitoring them in
their private spaces.
"It is a significant problem because in a week, at least one
domestic worker who approaches us for help has reported the
existence of surveillance cameras in the house or her room," said
Mr Wham.
A survey by Home of 670 maids this year showed one in five of them
had surveillance cameras in her room. But workers such as Ms Dewie
often choose not to report such infringements because they fear
losing their jobs. She was repatriated a week after her employers
found out last year she was talking to TWC2.
TWC2 board member Shelley Chio said: "Sometimes, the maids end up
blaming us out of frustration, when their cases are not settled
after three or four months. But my concern is: What if it happens
to the next maid the employers hire?"
There were 218,300 foreign maids in Singapore as of June last year,
which means that about one in five families here hires
one.
Maid agencies said they have received complaints about CCTVs from
maids. Said Mr Benny Liew, director of Comfort Employment: "CCTVs
are so common nowadays that maids are used to them, so fewer come
to us about it. But we have done transfers for maids who are
uncomfortable with the cameras.
"Usually, employers will take down the cameras in private areas
after we warn them. But there are grey areas such as cameras
installed outside their rooms but (which are) pointing in the
direction of their rooms."
He said those who install cameras at home should inform their
maids.
Ms Alison Chung, 35, who works in the media industry, initially
used a camera that looks like an adaptor. However, she has since
switched to a standard surveillance camera.
"I installed it in my son's room after I... found my helper
treating my son a little too rough for my liking," said Ms Chung,
whose son was eight months old at that time.
"But I believe employers should be honest with their helpers if
they do have CCTVs at home. They should show their helpers where
the cameras are located and explain their reasons for having the
cameras, so helpers know it isn't for spying but to monitor the
children."
Ms Susanto (not her real name), a 27-year-old maid, said: "I think
cameras outside our private spaces are okay, though that says a lot
about the lack of trust. But for those that violate our personal
space, they... cause us a lot of mental stress."