the root cause of the problem are a few.
(1)one major is the policies we had in the past, stopping down
to 2 is genocide and anyone with an average intelligent will aso
know that its bad for business and genocidal! th concept is the
same as looking at the platform of an mrt station that do not have
barrier shuitter safety doors! you dont need an intelligent man to
scream out such a flaw, see such an error.
(2)two, thue the years we have been fed with the worn g
direction in life, luxury and 5cs oveshadow our family ties and
core human values. as such we pursue material need over the limit
of what an average human being need and they have a chance to raise
our standards of living beywond that the lower income group can
mange. now with full speed ahead even many of our middle income
groups are feeling the hyperdrive!
(3)population imabalnce. bring in haftlings at the worng time
and improper thinking that it will increase our population actually
accelerated the numbers of our aging problem!
solution?
(1)yes we see is to increase our birthrate - and its iproper and
weird to see so many people of differt bntaionalities getting
ogather married. is it true love that will withstand the true test
of time or just an instinct to mate and raise a family out of peer
religion relative family friends pressure? the rate at which such
things happen should never be fast too!
beside having subsidiaries angpows to newborns, we must also
ensure foriegners or people who will leave spore later donot
benefit from such conadies. its after al our very own spore people
onies. we want to have average 2 child per married couple? then we
can make more expenses negligible or free for the first 2 children!
once we hit the quota we will have the perfect solution! TO
HAVE NEW BORNS NE CITIZENS THAT ARE BELOW 10 YEARS OLD AND WILL NOT
AGE 20 YEARS DOWN THE ROAD TO MAKE OUR AGING POPULATION THEN
WORSE!
(2)fine tuning new citzens PRs and cheap labor and foreign
talents.
we syill need them, but gahemn cannot wanton anyhow add ttheir
numbers.
new citizens PRs - if they are talented, true to wanna stay here
for life, financially sound and skiled with no criminal recrds,
healthy bad habits then we sure welcome them! however theur numbers
to be keep at a standard (or adjustable) to fine tune our
population number fluctautions periodcially. it can be reviewed and
adjusted yearly or bi-yearly. it should not be a easy quick
solution for people to plot the graphy and submit the report to
higher ups for show only!
foreign talents are suaully classified under 2 classes - skilled
talents and PMETS. if we need one or two talents specially skilled
ones, why not we havr to means we have to. PMETs. please regualte
at a ratio of intake against our singaporean numbers. say like 1
foreign talent against 3 sgreans and nore more than this!
cehap labor- are laborers costruction workers, serice line
people. should not go by the rario but rather should be controlled
as thses belongs to the rat category. if we dont regulate
their number sin their numebrs can multiply very fast.
also we should watch out for sub classes of unlawful labor
that may take a fraction of our jobs away from singaporea, and also
at the same time casues social security problems. these are suually
people tha cums in on social visit passes not as toursits
intention, or illegally!
